Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Proposal: Bars again

Failed 1-12 - cannot reach quorum without a change of vote. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 16 Mar 2006 03:49:28 UTC

dd a new rule entitled “Bars” with the following text:

Bars are the official unit of exchange for Gostaks and the Entities.  Each Gostak and Dosh Production Group has an amount of funds, measured in Bars and tracked in the GNDT.  A specific amount of Bars may be denoted by a | symbol in front of the number of Bars.  New Gostaks start with |0.

Give all Gostaks |1.
Name the 10th Floor “The Dosh Market”

Name the 11th Floor “The Bank”


Fixing an issue Kevin had with this.  Again, if you don’t like it, don’t support it, but don’t kill the proposal.

If more than a quorum’s worth of comments containing counted votes also contain the text “Bucky wins”, then add the following text to the end of law 1.9:

Any Gostak named Bucky has acheived victory and may declare victory at any time, and this sentence supercedes any rule which contradicts it.

 

posted by Bucky at 15 Mar 2006 03:05:29 UTC Comments (34)

Comments

Personman:

15-03-2006 04:57:02 UTC

against Hey, i don’t want to be mean here, but your continued attempts to coerce us into letting you win are getting on my nerves a bit. I find it very difficult to vote for a proposal, even if I like it (and I don’t really have anything against this one), with extraneous, somewhat obnoxious baggage attached. And the fact that that baggage could, in theory, result in you winning for no reason makes me even less anxious to vote for it. So if you could stop doing that it would be very much appreciated.

Bucky:

15-03-2006 05:01:44 UTC

I’m doing it when a proposal of mine fails.

Personman:

15-03-2006 06:13:25 UTC

What?

Angry Grasshopper:

15-03-2006 07:26:43 UTC

against

La la, can’t hear you.

Banja:

15-03-2006 10:20:44 UTC

against
I’m not sure we need a second type of currency.

Kevan: he/him

15-03-2006 11:54:14 UTC

against Voting against anyway, out of general mistrust and Bucky not being able to spell my name.

Bucky:

15-03-2006 14:24:40 UTC

AARGH! I fixed it in the other version!  I think…

smith:

15-03-2006 14:33:37 UTC

against

Personman:

15-03-2006 15:51:15 UTC

What?

Pangolin:

15-03-2006 15:53:54 UTC

against I agree that more currency seems to be unnecessary at the moment. Plus, I might just be new and missing something, but you seem quite annoying.

Personman:

15-03-2006 16:02:28 UTC

Why did my commect get submitted twice? That makes no sense. And like 9 hours later. Oh well.

90000:

15-03-2006 16:15:59 UTC

against

Rodney:

15-03-2006 16:56:19 UTC

against

Hix:

15-03-2006 20:18:38 UTC

against “Again, if you don’t like it, don’t support it, but don’t kill the proposal.” 
Ha!  We’ll vote however we choose, for any reason we choose.

Oh, and ***Bucky wins*** to encourage further against votes.

Elias IX:

15-03-2006 20:32:01 UTC

against, for the obvious reasons.

Quazie:

15-03-2006 21:46:37 UTC

this woudltn’ do anything anyways, it tells you to dd stuff, not add anything

Bucky:

15-03-2006 22:55:44 UTC

for

Bucky:

15-03-2006 22:56:06 UTC

That was vote 1^^^

Bucky:

15-03-2006 22:56:37 UTC

for Still 1

Bucky:

15-03-2006 22:56:52 UTC

for Still 1

Bucky:

15-03-2006 22:57:15 UTC

for Still 1

Bucky:

15-03-2006 22:57:28 UTC

for Still 1

Bucky:

15-03-2006 22:57:44 UTC

for Still 1

Bucky:

15-03-2006 22:58:06 UTC

for Still 1

Bucky:

15-03-2006 22:58:19 UTC

for Still 1

Bucky:

15-03-2006 22:58:38 UTC

for Still 1

Bucky:

15-03-2006 22:58:49 UTC

for Still 1

Bucky:

15-03-2006 22:59:01 UTC

for Still 1

Shadowclaw:

15-03-2006 23:03:32 UTC

against

Looks like I forgot to vote on this.

Bucky:

15-03-2006 23:04:40 UTC

for Still 1

Kevan: he/him

16-03-2006 02:00:30 UTC

I imagine that’s just flak. Would ask all admins (except those who’ve been on IRC and know what Bucky’s probably up to) to hold off failing this proposal for a while yet. Thanks.

Kevan: he/him

16-03-2006 02:03:21 UTC

I’ll say imperial for now, actually.

Bucky:

16-03-2006 02:05:35 UTC

Kevin: What am I up to?
for Still 1

Kevan: he/him

16-03-2006 11:48:38 UTC

against It seems safe to assume that you’re going to exploit anything you can find, Buckly.