Wednesday, June 03, 2009

Proposal: Beauty is in the eye of th… ACK! MY EYE!!

Vetoed—arth

Adminned at 04 Jun 2009 21:01:42 UTC

Create a new rule, “My face is up here”:

When a Contestant casts a vote of DEFERENTIAL on a proposal which has been created by a Contestant that has X or more Looks than the voter, the DEFERENTIAL vote is counted as a FOR instead of as a DEFERENTIAL. The value of X is equal to Quorum.

 

Sorry I wasn’t paying attention, what was your proposal again? Oh, wait… it passed already?

Comments

Bucky:

06-03-2009 00:47:33 UTC

The wording’s a bit rough, but for anyway

Rodlen:

06-03-2009 01:27:11 UTC

imperial

Bucky:

06-03-2009 02:37:26 UTC

I don’t think the “X or” does anything with the current wording; it might as well say a “Contestant that has more Looks than the voter”.

Klisz:

06-03-2009 03:20:05 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

06-03-2009 04:47:27 UTC

imperial Could be confusing.

delta:

06-03-2009 11:03:34 UTC

against

spikebrennan:

06-03-2009 16:47:25 UTC

Looks, as measured when: when the proposal is made?  When the DEF vote is cast?  When the proposal is adminned?

against

Psychotipath:

06-03-2009 17:39:16 UTC

against per Spike

Rodlen:

06-03-2009 20:56:55 UTC

against COV

Darknight:

06-03-2009 22:58:36 UTC

against

Bucky:

06-03-2009 23:43:37 UTC

CoV against

arthexis:

06-04-2009 00:06:17 UTC

@spike: It says it happens when votes are counted, votes are only counted when the proposal is admined. It wouldn’t have made sense any other time.

smith:

06-04-2009 00:11:08 UTC

for I’m a sucker for altering vote mechanics.

Qwazukee:

06-04-2009 08:25:20 UTC

CoV against

TAE:

06-04-2009 21:10:49 UTC

against

ais523:

06-04-2009 21:42:17 UTC

veto (AGAINST due to ambiguity, although I like the concept; VETO due to being antiquorumed after my AGAINST).