Monday, July 03, 2006

Proposal: Because Hix commented my last one at a bad time.

Vetoed upon Ascension
Failed by Hix

Adminned at 04 Jul 2006 13:02:59 UTC

In order to fix a problem left open by Kevan’s last proposal.

Ignore Italicized text when adminning this proposal.  If the Proposal titled “Reductio Decretum” failed, this Proposal does nothing.

Reword the first 3 paragraphs of Rule 2.10 (Enactment) as follows:

The oldest pending Proposal may be enacted by any Admin (and the Gamestate updated to include the its specified effects) if either of the following is true:-

  * It has a number of FOR votes that exceed or equal Quorum, has been open for voting for at least 12 hours, and has not been vetoed or self-killed.
  * It has been open for voting for at least 48 hours, more than half of its votes are FOR, and it has not been vetoed or self-killed.

A little redundant wording has also been removed in addition to the changes in bold.  Apologies for the wordiness of the italicized text..

Comments

Excalabur:

03-07-2006 03:02:06 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

03-07-2006 05:03:51 UTC

for I’d forgotten Ruleset was Gamestate. That really shouldn’t be buried away in the glossary.

And he brought me to the door of the court; and when I looked, behold a hole in the wall. (Ezekiel 8:7)

Purplebeard:

03-07-2006 08:25:44 UTC

for

Thelonious:

03-07-2006 08:42:32 UTC

for Nice scam

Kevan: he/him

03-07-2006 09:06:58 UTC

against  against  against Oh, Rule 2.10. Nice try.

Hix:

03-07-2006 15:41:04 UTC

against

Excalabur:

03-07-2006 17:39:01 UTC

against Tsk Tsk.

Greth:

03-07-2006 18:55:14 UTC

against

Angry Grasshopper:

03-07-2006 19:07:07 UTC

Heh.

against

Hix:

04-07-2006 08:39:14 UTC

veto