Reaches a quorum AGAINST 1-9 and fails. -scshunt
Adminned at 17 Jun 2012 21:01:52 UTC
Let the “Emperor Equivalent” be entirety of the part of the second sentence in the rule Dynasties that occurs after “known as the”
Repeal all Dynastic Rules.
Make Josh the Emperor Equivalent.
can’t make this a CfJ or else it might get vetoed. Designed to work still if someone else pulls off the same scam.
There is a place for core rules scams. They should not be used at all times. There is no fair play rule against them (there should be one). But there was nothing wrong with my DoV and this is a very petty CFJ.
Its there so that if enough people would rather not have you win, we have that option. There is no fair play rule against this either. Please don’t be a hypocrite and call this “petty” while exposing core rules scams.
But it would be great to see a discussion on whether and how we should restrict core rule scams.
Personally, I think core rules are still just rules, so scams are still valid.
Can we keep the same emperor for more than a day and a half? I feel like we’re in one of the more violent parts of Three Kingdoms.
I’m happy with the pseudo-agreement that’s built up of “core rules scams are only a good idea if the gamestate’s already in a sufficient mess that they’re likely to hurt not help, or in a dynasty specifically intended to encourage them”.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
omd: