Monday, April 05, 2010

Proposal: Because its going to come up

Timed out 1 vote to 11. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 07 Apr 2010 10:00:22 UTC

In the rule “The Settlement” after

Each Colonist has a Location that is tracked in the GNDT and corresponds to a location on the Settlement Map. New Colonists start at 13a if it is empty, otherwise they start in the empty location closest to 13a.

add

A Colonist is said to be Adjacent to any location whose position differs by one or less in both letter and number. (Thus 7Z is adjacent to 7Z, 8Z, 6Z, 7Y, 8Y, 6Y, 7a, 8a and 6a). Positions on the edge of the Settlement Map are not considered to be adjacent to positions on the opposite side of the map.

 

“differs by one in letter” is kinda unclear, but I feel like this does confirm we what we mean by adjacent, as I feel like it is currently undefined and could be this or orthogonally adjacent.

Comments

Clucky: he/him

05-04-2010 17:06:09 UTC

now that I look at the rules, orthogonally adjacent makes more sense.

Josh: he/they

05-04-2010 17:08:54 UTC

Yeah, I think that keeping adjacency consistently orthogonal makes more sense.

against

Klisz:

05-04-2010 17:12:58 UTC

imperial

Cl-cl…

Clucky!?

Me and Qwaz are active, you know…

Clucky: he/him

05-04-2010 17:16:56 UTC

yes, please don’t make me regret this. =)

Klisz:

05-04-2010 17:18:44 UTC

I won’t. Remember, the DDA is gone.

Hix:

05-04-2010 17:26:21 UTC

against orthogonal, just like movement.

Purplebeard:

05-04-2010 17:44:47 UTC

against Also, I’m not sure I’m comfortable with locations being adjacent to themselves.

SeerPenguin:

05-04-2010 18:33:49 UTC

against

Clucky: he/him

05-04-2010 18:42:11 UTC

like, I realized after the fact that my definition was silly, but it still needs to be defined as it will come up.

Darknight: he/him

05-04-2010 21:57:09 UTC

against

Keba:

05-04-2010 22:27:59 UTC

against

Tiberias:

05-04-2010 23:50:27 UTC

against

Kevan: City he/him

06-04-2010 10:31:02 UTC

against

Igthorn:

07-04-2010 05:50:28 UTC

imperial

Oracular rufio:

07-04-2010 16:34:21 UTC

against