Saturday, November 09, 2019

Proposal: Benefactors, like a boss

vetoed (like a boss)—card

Adminned at 10 Nov 2019 04:14:40 UTC

Create a new rule called “Benefactors”:

Each Adventurer has a Benefactor or none (defaulting to none), privately tracked by the Priest. Each Adventurer has an amount of Reward, which is privately tracked by the Priest and defaults to 0. Each time a Monster ceases to be a Monster (with such a Monster not being the Adventurer named Kevan), Adventurers with a Benefactor receive 1 Reward.

An Adventurer can, once per dynasty, set their Benefactor to one of their choice by spending 5 Merit and privately informing the Priest of their choice of Benefactor (by Private Message). Benefactors, and their effects (if any) are the following:

- Licatho:
- Doxortho:

Amend the last paragraph of “Cathedral” to:

When the Cathedral is destroyed, the Priest shall Parade the Adventurers in a timely fashion, which is an Atomic Action of the following Steps:
- For each Adventurer, grant them Merit equal to X, where X=(100 + Their Reward amount * 50)/(Amount of Adventurers that have their Benefactor).
- Make a Blog Post with the tag [Parade] in the title.

After the Priest performs that Atomic Action, victory shall belong to the Adventurer who has the greatest amount of Merits and is not otherwise barred from achieving victory. If there are more than one Adventurers fulfilling these criteria, the one who gained the greatest amount of Havoc as the Monster shall be victorious. If there is again a tie, the Adventurer who became the Monster the earliest shall be victorious.

Intrigue minigame where people try to put themselves into the group with the least people.

Delaying it for everyone (it’s for Monsters after Kevan) to give more time to think and talk about it.

Comments

Kevan: he/him

09-11-2019 12:10:51 UTC

against Feels like this will either be pure luck, or honest public discussion with the Traitor easily fooling us.

The Duke of Waltham: he/him

09-11-2019 14:45:03 UTC

imperial

TyGuy6:

09-11-2019 19:33:00 UTC

for I don’t see how a single player can pull a reversal, even with full information on this.

TyGuy6:

09-11-2019 19:36:18 UTC

Unless the two benefactors became a “one better than the other” tragedy of the commons scenario! Seems likely we’d be building to that.
against CoV

card:

09-11-2019 19:46:26 UTC

seems too random and swingy against

Madrid:

09-11-2019 19:57:33 UTC

veto The people have spoken (and I want my proposal slots)