Friday, March 05, 2010

Proposal: Blueprint: Running A Bit Hot

Timed out 11 votes to 2. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 07 Mar 2010 06:58:09 UTC

Add a new subrule to Rule 2.2 (Inventions) called “Flame Vent”:-

Cost: 2 Iron     Power Requirement: -10
If the owner of an Invention with a Flame Vent owns an Invention with Wood in its Composition, the Invention with Wood in its Composition is destroyed. (If an Invention with a Flame Vent would have a Power Requirement lower than 0, its Power Requirement is instead 0.)

Comments

Josh: Observer he/they

05-03-2010 11:25:12 UTC

for

Put:

05-03-2010 12:12:21 UTC

so this reduces power requirement at the cost of possibly destroying one of your inventions?

lordcooper:

05-03-2010 13:13:43 UTC

imperial So basically, this would prevent me from using wood if I built one.  Doesn’t seem too useful really…

Kevan: he/him

05-03-2010 14:22:20 UTC

It has the advantage of cheaply reducing the ongoing Power Requirement of an Invention, at the cost of preventing you from owning any wood-based Inventions. In some situations it’s useful, in others it’s not.

lordcooper:

05-03-2010 14:35:52 UTC

COV against
Would make it too easy for Commoners to completely negate power requirements

Klisz:

05-03-2010 14:48:29 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

05-03-2010 14:49:12 UTC

You can only have one of any Part per Invention, so I think you’d struggle to actually reduce an Invention’s Power Requirement to zero. (Even if you bolted a Flame Vent onto Wings, the current lowest-power Part, the Invention would have a total Power Requirement of 9, after you’d factored in the “square of the number of Parts” and “five times the number of different Resources involved in its Composition”.)

Roujo: he/him

05-03-2010 16:01:38 UTC

for Per Kevan. I probably won’t be using this part, though. =P

ais523:

05-03-2010 17:20:57 UTC

for I don’t mind Commoners completely negating requirements at the cost of a crippling weakness.

Purplebeard:

05-03-2010 20:35:20 UTC

for

dbdougla:

05-03-2010 21:23:54 UTC

for

Anonyman:

05-03-2010 23:17:48 UTC

for

redtara: they/them

05-03-2010 23:36:31 UTC

against

tecslicer:

06-03-2010 02:43:54 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

06-03-2010 03:21:04 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

07-03-2010 08:51:30 UTC

for