Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Proposal: Broken Rule

Self Killed—yuri_dragon_17

Adminned at 03 Oct 2009 20:53:08 UTC

Repeal the Rule “Deadline.”

“25th of September” could refer to any year whatsoever, 2010 for example, and thus this rule has no effect.

Comments

Josh:

09-30-2009 13:31:14 UTC

against Too slippery. The dynasty didn’t exist this time last year, won’t exist this time next year, so for our purposes we all know what it means.

Qwazukee:

09-30-2009 14:07:07 UTC

Knowing what something is intended to mean is not good policy for Rules . . . it seems like each Dynasty, our Ruleset gets looser and looser.

Josh:

09-30-2009 14:30:19 UTC

I’ve been around for a while. Trust me, we’ve had bigger ambiguities than this slip through unexploited.

Josh:

09-30-2009 14:31:18 UTC

Also, I’m unclear as to why you’re repealling the rule rather than amending it.

Klisz:

09-30-2009 15:14:38 UTC

against  It can clearly and unambiguously be interpreted as “25th of September of any year”.

Amnistar:

09-30-2009 17:03:33 UTC

It doesn’t matter becuase the rule, if acurate, would mean that anyone unidling now would be infected, as it stands, without any clarification, it means that anyone that unidled, ever, would be infected.

Klisz:

09-30-2009 17:18:53 UTC

CoV for  per Amni.

Josh:

09-30-2009 17:23:04 UTC

That’s an extreme interpretation.

But… okay.  for

Ienpw III:

09-30-2009 19:20:27 UTC

against in favour of a fix

Bucky:

09-30-2009 23:56:08 UTC

for

arthexis:

10-01-2009 00:14:00 UTC

against per Amni

Darknight:

10-01-2009 00:33:04 UTC

imperial

Josh:

10-01-2009 11:06:30 UTC

Haha.

So if this fails, Arthexis has a legit claim to victory, right?

ais523:

10-01-2009 14:08:47 UTC

ouch, for to get a better-known gamestate than the one we have atm.

Amnistar:

10-01-2009 22:01:39 UTC

I love that I gave an explanation, and half the people vote FOR because of it and half vote AGAINST.

Here’s the deal.  If it were clarified, i.e. stated the year….everyone that unidled now would be infected.  Because it’s after the 25th of this year.

Without clarification, it means after a date which is every year, so it’s always after the date, so everyone that unidle now would be infected.

Ergo, the rule wording doesn’t make a difference because it should apply to everyone even if you put in the year restriction.

Qwazukee:

10-01-2009 23:31:35 UTC

Oh, I see

S/k against

Qwazukee:

10-02-2009 06:43:00 UTC

veto  veto  veto  veto  veto