Since there’s no frequency limit, someone with a gun and a few Silver Bullets could win simply by shooting everyone else with Lead, and then shooting all the survivers with Silver.  Similarly, a werewolf could win by shooting everyone with lead over a very short time interval.

(The only exception happens if the Doctor is targeting himself.)

(Also, you may want to rewrite this to correctly handle the case where a Living Villager shoots a Dead Villager who’s also the Doctor’s patient.)

Whoops.

Also, a silver bullet may be used an infinite number of times between when the email is sent and the Mayor removes it from the inventory.

It’s a minor point, but everyone will know who fires a silver bullet by a simple GNDT check.

Flawed execution, but on the right track.  Werewolves can generally kill a Villager per Night if they have their act together, but Villagers can only kill a suspected werewolf through a ponderous process that requires a Proposal that goes through the whole queue and that might not get enacted for a while.  It’s an uneven playing field.

I’d vote yes if not for the unlimited times you can shoot someone.

Hix is right; I just couldn’t see a clean solution for it, and chances are that we won’t have too many guns floating around anyway, so it will always be fairly obvious as to who fired.

Since there exist 2 guns currently, and you’l lhave to pry them from my cold dead hands….litterally… :P

The mechanic is interesting, but perhaps rather than a killing happening, if you hit them with a gun normally, they become wounded or some such, a visable status ailement, perhaps one that affects gameplay during the evening (if a wounded player is targeted by a single werewolf, they are killed or some such).

So that you can “shoot to kill” or “shoot to cripple”?  there’s an idea.