Seems like a reasonable idea. We might want to later add a way for Civilians to signal that there are no further Proposal ideas coming and that they want to waive the 48-hour minimum between Breaking Ins.

I’m not sure we need it. It would be one thing if the teams were static, but with people changing every break-in, I don’t see anyone pushing for marginal benefits for only their own team with the intent to reverse it later. At a cost of 48 hours per break-in, I’m not sure there’s enough benefit to justify slowing down the game that much.

I’m with SB on this one

Agreed on the slowdown of doing this every time.

We may need to do the “this Break-In has started and will be played under the dynastic ruleset as it was at 09:39 on Thursday” thing that we did for Giolitti, Battlebots and the Wizard Duel.

I feel like because it’s a team game I’m hesitant to propose patches that hurt my team even if I phrase it in a way that doesn’t kick in until next round because the other team could use that information to adjust their plan accordingly

I also agree that this is unnecessary. I don’t expect team affiliation to be a major factor in proposal voting until late in the dynasty, and by that point proposal voting patterns are usually broken anyway.

https://blognomic.com/archive/be_prepared._your_team_depends_on_you

divisions on that proposal are literally split along team lines so its pretty clear that team affiliation is already a major factor in proposal voting