First off, why are we punishing legal scams? especially ones done weeks ago? That feels rather anti-nomic.

Secondly, ayesdeeef also performed the same scam you did to get a second card arguing they never performed the first action while idle but that isn’t tracked here.

Finally, this has all the same “I could spend a card and still get the rewards for spending the card” problems that my CfJ does

Spending the cards only has an effect if the Past Memory is online, though (as the card is removed at the point at which the Past Memory processes the action). I was expecting this CfJ to pass quickly, as, in effect, a “timing counterscam”.

but this has the exact same problem as my original CfJ. If we can pass this one quickly, we can pass mine quickly.

The difference is that all mine does is fixes a mistake, while this punishes people for a legitimate scam two weeks after it was performed

per Clucky

This situation is too complicated, and we need to work out what actually happened and what the fix should be in order to ensure that a CfJ will be watertight.

This could also impact pending Reminiscence actions, which will fizzle if the card doesn’t exist. It also blocks these players from gaining any new cards while this is pending, if that’s relevant.

But we can always propose what we like, it’s all part of the game. If anything this seems a risky gambit for encouraging players to wave through mild future scams from Josh and reverse them later at a more opportune moment, pointing back to this precedent. Nomic!