Monday, July 17, 2017

Proposal: Carpe Sinciput

Times out 5-0. Enacted by pokes.

Adminned at 19 Jul 2017 20:51:30 UTC

In “Pact Magic”, replace “Any Pactmaker can (and should, unless there already is one of these for the case) raise a Magic Backlash Official Post.” with:-

If a Pactmaker believes that another Pactmaker’s action has broken a Promise, and if that action has not already been the subject of a Magic Backlash or a Mea Culpa, they may raise a Magic Backlash Official Post about it.

Then add to that rule:-

If a Pactmaker posts a comment of “Mea Culpa” in relation to an action they have taken which they believe breaks one of their own Promises, then that Pactmaker immediately acquires Extreme Seizures with regard to that Promise and action.

Saving some time when a Promise-breaker doesn’t dispute their own behaviour.

posted by Kevan at 17 Jul 2017 10:02:00 UTC Comments (7)

Comments

Madrid:

17-07-2017 11:55:46 UTC

this was my intent for the “Cracking” thing (and given your comment on it, I believe you didn’t catch the idea. Illustrates that it wasn’t written as well as I’d hoped) but this has better wording for it.

Kevan: City he/him

17-07-2017 12:09:29 UTC

It looks like you entirely rewrote the proposal after I commented on it - your original was describing an automatic retriggering of a Backlash for “the same kind of infraction”.

You didn’t mention that you’d rewritten it, so I didn’t reassess my AGAINST vote.

Madrid:

17-07-2017 12:24:59 UTC

“OK. This might not be the best solution, but it works.

For example, I can go “I crack promise #4. That proposal could make Apples turn into Potatoes.””

I didn’t mention I editted it at that moment though, that could’ve been the flaw.

Madrid:

18-07-2017 12:38:09 UTC

for

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus: he/they

18-07-2017 19:18:37 UTC

for

pokes:

18-07-2017 20:42:32 UTC

for

Thunder: he/him

18-07-2017 21:42:54 UTC

for