Saturday, January 12, 2019

Story Post: Case 35: Goldberg Technology v. Morgan

In this Malpractice case, Goldberg Technology claims that Morgan (V) did a criminally poor job in his temporary stint replacing Morgan (IV) as CFO.


Kevan: he/him

13-01-2019 10:27:36 UTC

for My client puts all blame on the company’s baroque accounting and telecommunication systems.


14-01-2019 07:27:37 UTC

Morgan is the worst. So there.

Kevan: he/him

14-01-2019 15:07:56 UTC

against I present Exhibit A, Goldberg’s High-Speed Self-Propelled Memo-Delivery System still in use in the CFO’s office, which—[explosion, duck feathers]


15-01-2019 03:46:59 UTC

The court finds Morgan’s ersatz Financial Officering to have been at least… competent. Morgan is the winner, and the fine is $0. This case is now closed.