Monday, October 12, 2015

Proposal: Casus Belli

Passes 7-0. Enacted by Brendan.

Adminned at 14 Oct 2015 22:10:03 UTC

Replace the paragraph in the rule “Loyalty” that reads “A Cardinal whose Loyalty is Colonna or Orsini is a Roman. A Cardinal whose Loyalty is France or Spain is a Foreigner.” with

A Cardinal whose Loyalty is Colonna or Orsini is a Roman. A Cardinal whose Loyalty is France or Spain is a Foreigner. A Cardinal whose Loyalty is Florence, Naples or Venice is a Representative. This is known as a Cardinal’s Alliance.

Add a new paragraph to the rule “Nepotism” as follows:

If a Cardinal shares an Alliance with the Pope, they are considered to have 2 extra Nepotism for the purposes of gaining Influence under this rule, or 3 extra Nepotism instead if they also share the Pope’s Loyalty.

posted by Brendan at 12 Oct 2015 21:58:00 UTC Comments (9)

Comments

Brendan: he/him

12-10-2015 22:25:23 UTC

I think this works as written, but yes, I realize that if this gets traction I should add a cause clarifying that “none” is not a valid shared Loyalty.

delcooper11:

12-10-2015 23:23:07 UTC

against

“As a weekly action, a Cardinal other than the Pope may change their Loyalty.”

Does this not mean that the Pope will never have a Loyalty, and therefore no Alliance?

Brendan: he/him

13-10-2015 00:46:49 UTC

[delcooper11] See the last paragraph of the rule “Invasion:”

“If an Invasion has been pending for more than 48 hours, and its Attack Strength is greater than or equal to its Defence Strength, it may be Enacted by any Admin. The Pope’s Loyalty is changed to that of the Invading Power.”

Thrawn:

13-10-2015 02:00:59 UTC

for

delcooper11:

13-10-2015 04:06:27 UTC

Ah, in that case, I change my vote.  for

ayesdeeef:

13-10-2015 04:38:26 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

13-10-2015 08:43:53 UTC

for

Purplebeard:

13-10-2015 14:02:02 UTC

for

Roberto:

14-10-2015 06:54:30 UTC

for