Friday, October 21, 2011

Call for Judgment: CfJ: Friends together Redux

failed by CfJ “http://blognomic.com/archive/compromise_mark_4_again” -Bucky
unfailed by coppro - the enactment was illegal

CfJ is illegal because it does not “describe the issue” per Rule 1.7. -Ornithopter

Adminned at 22 Oct 2011 14:23:16 UTC

Fail all Pending CfJs.

Replace Artist with ‘Dinosaur’ and ‘Critic’ with ‘Tyrannosaurus Rex’ throughout the ruleset. Repeal all dynastic rules. Start a new dynasty with Amnistar as its Tyrannosaurus Rex.

posted by Amnistar at 21 Oct 2011 03:52:15 UTC Comments (36)

Comments

redtara: they/themIdle

21-10-2011 03:54:56 UTC

for

zuff: Idle

21-10-2011 03:55:47 UTC

against

southpointingchariot: Idle

21-10-2011 04:00:55 UTC

for

Blorg: Idle

21-10-2011 04:02:03 UTC

for

omd: Idle

21-10-2011 04:03:36 UTC

arrow

Yally: Idle

21-10-2011 04:03:38 UTC

against

Klisz: Idle

21-10-2011 04:06:00 UTC

against

scshunt: Idle

21-10-2011 04:06:29 UTC

If all you want is to end the madness and start a new dynasty, what’s wrong with http://blognomic.com/archive/cfj_attn_cotc/ ?

Klisz: Idle

21-10-2011 04:07:12 UTC

against

Amnistar: he/himIdle

21-10-2011 04:07:27 UTC

Because I wouldn’t have fun with that dynasty and I would with this one?

Klisz: Idle

21-10-2011 04:08:50 UTC

But you said an Agora-themed dynasty would be hilarious. Plus, nomics being players of each other would set an awesome precedent.

zuff: Idle

21-10-2011 04:10:12 UTC

Amnistar: I don’t quite understand how you’re going from saying _exactly what we’re doing_ would be hilarious and you’d support it, to saying that what we’re doing is no fun.

We completely agree—invading to start a dynasty based around an exaggerated caricaturisation of Agora would be hilarious, without removing the core ruleset or anything! That’s why the CfJ coppro linked does exactly that!

Amnistar: he/himIdle

21-10-2011 04:10:22 UTC

No, I said that a group of people jumping in and engineer a win for themselves by playing withing the dynastic ruleset would be hillarious, not the actual dynasty proposed.

Amnistar: he/himIdle

21-10-2011 04:12:48 UTC

Bah, I see what you mean and that was phrased poorly. I’m sorry for the confusion.  I honestly dislike the more ‘rules laywer’ dynasties because they tend to bog down very quickly.  I prefer the dynasties that have a different game theme set-up that people then are allowed to look for loopholes to secure a win.

A dynasty based entirely around finding loopholes seems like it wouldn’t be enjoyable to me.

omd: Idle

21-10-2011 04:20:10 UTC

Agree to disagree, then. :)

scshunt: Idle

21-10-2011 04:21:05 UTC

I’m not entirely sure if I want a scam-based dynasty. I kind of envision it more as a dynasty where we try to import Agoran concepts in BlogNomic fashion

Amnistar: he/himIdle

21-10-2011 04:21:35 UTC

Oh definately.  If you guys pull it off I’ll just idle out again and not play.  I was around when we did a legalistic game based entirely off that thing, player count dropped like 70% and posting stopped until someone ‘accidentally’ put in a loophole that I was able to exploit and win.

scshunt: Idle

21-10-2011 04:23:34 UTC

Or you could support it and help it become that!

Murphy: Idle

21-10-2011 04:25:49 UTC

against

Agora is at least recruiting shock troops. Why should you get a dynasty just for “oh hey here’s an idea for a theme”?

Amnistar: he/himIdle

21-10-2011 04:27:57 UTC

As stated before, it is presented as an alternative dynasty idea. I have a theme, I’ve run succesful dynasties in the past and people don’t like the other options presented.

Roujo: he/himIdle

21-10-2011 04:28:01 UTC

against

flurie: Idle

21-10-2011 04:42:40 UTC

You also most recently seem to have run unsuccessful dynasties.

“General Amnistar went Idle, causing everyone to lose interest in the Dynasty.”

against

Ornithopter: Idle

21-10-2011 06:16:14 UTC

for, but only if I get to be the one who eats Sam Neil.

Bucky: Idle

21-10-2011 06:22:06 UTC

against

scshunt: Idle

21-10-2011 07:20:15 UTC

against

Shadowclaw: Idle

21-10-2011 10:06:07 UTC

for

Kevan: Concierge he/him

21-10-2011 10:27:20 UTC

against

Wooble: Idle

21-10-2011 11:26:26 UTC

against

CWW: Idle

21-10-2011 12:07:01 UTC

against

Prince Anduril: Idle

21-10-2011 12:25:27 UTC

against

ChronosPhaenon: Idle

21-10-2011 13:46:34 UTC

against

Rodney: Idle

21-10-2011 13:54:02 UTC

against This would leave the reenactment loophole open.

ais523:

21-10-2011 16:32:49 UTC

against I prefer your other dynasty idea. Save this one for when you win by yourself.

Brendan: he/himIdle

21-10-2011 16:47:48 UTC

against

Pavitra: Idle

21-10-2011 16:53:45 UTC

against

Josh: he/theyIdle

22-10-2011 10:33:54 UTC

against