Friday, October 21, 2011

Call for Judgment: CfJ: The only option

Failed by CfJ “Compromise mark 4: Again”
unfailed by coppro - the enactment was illegal

CfJ is illegal because it does not “describe the issue” per Rule 1.7. -Ornithopter

Adminned at 22 Oct 2011 14:22:57 UTC

Fail this CfJ.

posted by zuff at 21 Oct 2011 03:47:56 UTC Comments (21)

Comments

scshunt:

21-10-2011 03:48:43 UTC

for

redtara: they/them

21-10-2011 03:50:42 UTC

This has no effect if it passes because then it would never pass.

Pavitra:

21-10-2011 03:51:22 UTC

for because I just want *something* to happen already.

scshunt:

21-10-2011 03:55:04 UTC

I’ve unadminned this one because it does have an effect on the present game state: namely, it would fail a currently-pending CFJ.

Amnistar: he/him

21-10-2011 03:56:06 UTC

I mean, I’ll not touch it again, but it literally doesn’t matter if it’s opened or closed.

redtara: they/them

21-10-2011 03:57:16 UTC

It both does and does not have an effect on gamestate; it’s a paradox.

Blognomic has no provisions for paradoxes. against

Klisz:

21-10-2011 04:06:58 UTC

against

Roujo: he/him

21-10-2011 04:10:23 UTC

for

Murphy:

21-10-2011 04:22:49 UTC

for  arrow

Bucky:

21-10-2011 04:30:01 UTC

against Failing a CfJ after it enacts does work but does not, in the general case, do anything.

flurie:

21-10-2011 04:37:07 UTC

It would only fail after it’s passed, so I don’t see why it’s a paradox. Surely it can be adminned twice: once for its passage, and once for its enactment. It ultimately leads to the failure of this CfJ in either case.

Ornithopter:

21-10-2011 04:38:00 UTC

against
Failing it by vote is faster, in any case.

Shadowclaw:

21-10-2011 10:05:05 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

21-10-2011 10:26:32 UTC

against

Wooble:

21-10-2011 11:25:57 UTC

for

CWW:

21-10-2011 12:07:20 UTC

for  arrow

Prince Anduril:

21-10-2011 12:23:09 UTC

against

ais523:

21-10-2011 12:47:03 UTC

for  arrow

ChronosPhaenon:

21-10-2011 13:47:33 UTC

arrow  against

Brendan: he/him

21-10-2011 16:48:37 UTC

against

Josh: he/they

22-10-2011 10:33:43 UTC

against