Monday, June 22, 2009

Call for Judgment: Challenging the Challenge

Passes 8-0. - Qwazukee

Adminned at 26 Jun 2009 06:13:47 UTC

For the purposes of the current Challenge, if a Contestant posts (or has posted) the Dryness of a room when they should have posted the Integrity, for the purposes of the Challenge it shall be considered as if they had posted the Integrity (this does not change the actual value of the Integrity to the value of the Dryness, but does prevent Contestants from becoming Evacuees because they posted Dryness rather than Integrity).

Well, since NO ONE has managed to successfully barricade a room or pump water, I figured it was worth a CfJ. Certainly, ais523 did not intend for the current situation to come about, and would have preferred it this way rather than the mess we’re in now.

posted by Qwazukee at 22 Jun 2009 10:32:01 UTC Comments (11)

Comments

Qwazukee:

22-06-2009 10:39:26 UTC

for

Clucky: he/him

22-06-2009 14:12:56 UTC

This doesn’t actually fix anything though, we are all still technically Evacuees. We’d also have to fix that problem.

Qwazukee:

22-06-2009 14:56:26 UTC

I was thinking this would retroactively make us Remaining Contestants. Do you think it is necessary to make a separate CfJ to make us non-Evacuees? Either way, this is worth passing, if only to prevent others from falling into the same trap as us.

redtara: they/them

22-06-2009 15:39:42 UTC

for No proposal may have retroactive application.

Qwazukee:

22-06-2009 15:41:15 UTC

This isn’t a Proposal, it’s a CfJ, which can be retroactive in certain instances. I’m not sure that the way I’ve written it works that way, however.

Klisz:

22-06-2009 15:45:18 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

22-06-2009 21:06:58 UTC

for

Psychotipath:

23-06-2009 07:21:41 UTC

for

Amnistar: he/him

25-06-2009 08:55:29 UTC

for

ais523:

25-06-2009 09:53:07 UTC

for to get this out of the sidebar.

Shem:

25-06-2009 10:11:03 UTC

for