Wednesday, January 15, 2025

Proposal: Changing the Locks

Reaches quorum with 8-0 and is enacted -SingularByte

Adminned at 16 Jan 2025 07:03:59 UTC

If the Proposal “Security” was not enacted, the rest of this Proposal has no effect.

Add a subrule to “The Vault {I}” named “Conversion {I}” with the following text:

If a Proposal contains instructions to change one or more dynastic rules from Immutable to Mutable or from Mutable to Immutable, that Proposal is known as a Transmutation.

A Transmutation containing at least one instruction to change a dynastic rule from Immutable to Mutable can only be enacted if at least one of the following is true:
* It has a number of FOR Votes greater than or equal to 2/3rds of the number of Participants, it has been open for at least 12 hours, and either one of the Masterminds has Voted FOR it or neither of the Masterminds has voted AGAINST it.
* It has a number of FOR Votes greater than or equal to 2/3rds of the number of Participants, and it has been open for at least 24 hours.

Greater protections for changing an Immutable dynastic rule into a Mutable one, since that will likely have a larger impact. Unlike OG Nomic, I’m not suggesting it to be unanimous.

Comments

JonathanDark: he/him

15-01-2025 19:04:47 UTC

I’m open to changing “2/3rds” to whatever value is practical, but I do think it should be greater than quorum. Even “quorum+1” would be fine.

ais523: Mastermind

15-01-2025 19:08:20 UTC

I was wondering about “size of the larger team + 1” but that runs into issues when there are participants who haven’t been assigned to teams yet, so probably 2/3 is better. I would prefer “greater than or equal to 2/3” rather than “greater than 2/3”, though – the latter is a very difficult requirement to meet at certain player counts, including 6.

JonathanDark: he/him

15-01-2025 19:20:22 UTC

Changed to “greater than or equal to”

Josh: Mastermind he/they

15-01-2025 23:18:00 UTC

for

Raven1207: he/they

15-01-2025 23:24:22 UTC

for

ais523: Mastermind

15-01-2025 23:25:39 UTC

for

Brendan: he/him

16-01-2025 02:51:20 UTC

for

Habanero:

16-01-2025 03:01:04 UTC

imperial

Janet: she/her

16-01-2025 03:19:48 UTC

There are ways to get around this, but sure.  for

JonathanDark: he/him

16-01-2025 03:24:57 UTC

It’s in the theme to try to get around these things. :D

SingularByte: he/him

16-01-2025 06:42:50 UTC

for