Just curious, why is this a CfJ? There’s no disagreement of the rules to arbitrate here.

Kind of breaks the utility that the rule was introduced to fix in the first place (to place bets on the Menagerie). Better to just introduce a clause that clarifies you can’t spend Cheese in place of Prestige, or something to that effect.

I believe the ruleset allows CfJs when “an aspect of the game needs urgent attention,” whatever that might mean to whoever posts one.

I mean rule seemed obviously written with the idea of letting people spend cheese in mind

if you didn’t catch that, it’s on you. If you wanna try and convince others to change it, that’s also within the scope of the game. But trying to use a CfJ to rush something like this through definitely goes against the spirit of the game

Agreed. I know an unfairness seems urgent, but that’s actually considered part of BlogNomic that players will try to get Proposals introduced that give them benefits, and if you notice it too late, it’s on you to go through the normal process to address it.

“Urgent” is generally meant in terms of game-breaking issues, such as a rule that’s too unclear to allow the game mechanics to continue.