Fewer than a quorum not voting AGAINST. Failed 1 vote to 6 by Kevan.
Adminned at 19 Jan 2023 09:01:37 UTC
Under the antecedent in the Ruleset;
Optionally, they may also do one of the following:
Append a point as follows:
* Remove 6 of any two type or 4 of any one type of a resource from their Stockpile. If the Settler has removed 6 of any two type or 4 of any one type this way; they may replace any of their Domain to any valid value for Domains.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Comments
JonathanDark: he/him
“any of their Domain” should that be “any one of their Domains”, or did you intend to leave it open to replace one or more Domain values?
Also, if it is “any one”, could a Settler do this multiple times in between Production of Resources as long as they had the resources in their Stockpile?
Chiiika: she/her
@JD
one or more; yep.
also; this is grouped into Harvests so you cannot harvest; reset values; then harvest again so no; you can only do this once when you Harvest
Chiiika: she/her
@JD
one or more; yep.
also; this is grouped into Harvests so you cannot harvest; reset values; then harvest again so no; you can only do this once when you Harvest
Chiiika: she/her
oof
JonathanDark: he/him
Oh yeah, right, I see now where this would be going. Sorry I missed that.
As far as replacing all of the Domain values by expending just 2 resources, that seems a bit undervalued. A Church cost 2 Stone and allows just 1 Domain number replacement.
Would you consider raising the resource cost? I’m not sure what would be appropriate, but somewhere in the 4-6 range feels right.
Chiiika: she/her
Yep - did that; 6 on two resource types or 4 of one
Kevan: he/him
Seems like it’s diminishing the other mechanics, to broadly say that a glut of anything is always good for a Domain reset - and that it can be used to dodge the now-bad-for-rich-players-maybe Thug?
Would seem more interesting if that player was under pressure to Trade a glut away at cost, or invest it into Buildings that they maybe didn’t entirely need right now.
Josh: he/they
Raven1207: he/him
Trapdoorspyder: Onlooker
Kevan: he/him
quirck: he/him
Raven1207: he/him
Cov
JonathanDark: he/him