Friday, January 13, 2012

Proposal: Chronos got no mob but it’s okay I got a taxi

Timed out and failed, 2-3, with two unresolved DEFs. Josh

Adminned at 15 Jan 2012 02:46:37 UTC

Create a new GNDT column with title “Family”.
Create a new rule, titled “Families” and reading:

Each Criminal may belong to up to one Family; this is tracked in the GNDT. A Criminal who belongs to no Family may set their Family at any time, to any valid English phrase.
At any time, a Criminal may transfer any positive amount of Wealth or Firepower from themselves to any other Criminal that belong to the same Family as they do, unless that would result in either of those two Criminals having negative Wealth or Firepower.

I was gonna propose a fix to Chronos’s proposal, then I saw it was self-killed again… Sorry I did not quote the Appendix fast enough the first time. I tried ten different wordings with “sequence of characters” in place of “valid English phrase” then gave up because I ended up with long boring mathematical sentences.
Btw, Clucky’s “I dislike how there isn’t any control over who is in your family.” got me thinking… Families could be more than just a way to transfer goods. How about families could have some kind of “mini-ruleset” by which its members abide?
This would allow “safe places” for negociations, though not too powerful since you cannot get out of a family easily.

Comments

omd:

01-13-2012 01:57:22 UTC

against

I still don’t like explicit factions. *shrug*

Cpt_Koen:

01-13-2012 01:59:53 UTC

BTW when one forget the < / blockquote >, the flavour text gets into the blockquote. Funky.

Bucky:

01-13-2012 02:17:14 UTC

imperial

Darknight:

01-13-2012 02:44:57 UTC

imperial

ChronosPhaenon:

01-13-2012 04:16:06 UTC

for

Josh:

01-13-2012 07:20:05 UTC

against per omd

scshunt:

01-15-2012 01:33:48 UTC

against