Proposal: Cleaning up
Passes 14-1. —Brendan
Adminned at 02 Dec 2010 10:25:15 UTC
If the proposal “Laborem fatigat” passes, replace all instances of “OldName” in this proposal with “Nomen”
To the rule 2.1 “The old gods” add the following:
If upon de-idling or advancing to a new age the GNDT-values of a divinity are reset, the value “OldName” is not changed.
To rule 2.3 “Ages” add the following:
Whenever two or more divinities are tied for the highest value in prominence, the current Optimus Divinity will remain the Optimus Divinity for the next Age.
Making the OldName a static value over the Ages. We do not want to go insane due to mutiple personalities, would we?
Resolving the CfJ, according to the principle: When two quarrel, the third takes the advantage.
I’d prefer a DICE roll as a tiebreaker, to be honest. Also, note that this proposal would actually alter itself (i.e. the text of the post) if enacted, but it’s probably safe in this case.
Maybe we could make it so that the Age simply cannot be advanced if two Divinities are tied for Prominence.
SethOcean: