Saturday, October 22, 2011

Call for Judgment: Cleaning up the CfJ’s

Illegal per 1.7 due to failure to explain the issue. The flavour text does not count per the glossary. - adminned by coppro

Adminned at 22 Oct 2011 14:35:42 UTC

If the following CfJ’s are still pending, fail them:

12/18/08
Call for Judgment: Categorical imperative, redux
pass me quick
too many?
Emergency Law
Emergency Law patch
CfJ: Why can’t we all just get along?
Big Red Button
CfJ: The only option
CfJ: Friends together Redux
Legally Cleaning Up 1.7
FOR THE LOVE OF SUBER
Well, now that that’s over
Time to take control
Hey, you know what happens when you look for core rules scams?
Time travel can’t change the past

Conceptually will close out the CfJ’s which have no chance of passing and are only furthering to divide the group of nomic players.  Ideally this will pass with an overwhelming majority of votes showing that people want to play the game and not just screw around.

Comments

ais523:

10-22-2011 19:27:57 UTC

for Please, everyone on both sides vote for this. It obviously isn’t a scam, and it’ll just help us get back to regular gameplay faster.

zuff:

10-22-2011 19:28:41 UTC

against the implication that if I vote for this it’s because of partisanship, but for the effects.

Sgeo:

10-22-2011 19:30:05 UTC

As a prior Agoran bloc voter who is now interested in playing BlogNomic,  for

Hix:

10-22-2011 19:33:33 UTC

for

Pavitra:

10-22-2011 19:39:45 UTC

for

Ornithopter:

10-22-2011 19:42:02 UTC

for
I disgree with the inclusion of “Time travel…” in the category “CfJ’s which [...] are only furthering to divide the group of nomic players”, but it’s likely going to fail already, and if it doesn’t, we’ve got big trouble on our hands.

flurie:

10-22-2011 19:42:45 UTC

for

Amnistar:

10-22-2011 19:44:42 UTC

Yes, that should have been And/Or I’m sorry guys.  I didn’t mean to imply everything there was a partisan proposal.

Kevan:

10-22-2011 19:45:29 UTC

for

Bucky:

10-22-2011 19:48:38 UTC

for

Murphy:

10-22-2011 19:50:23 UTC

for

zuff:

10-22-2011 19:53:23 UTC

Amnistar: Actually, my objection was to ais’ comment; the flavour text seems reasonable to me. :)

zuff:

10-22-2011 19:57:16 UTC

Note that if any CfJ listed is adminned, this whole CfJ has no effect; I suggest admins avoid adminning any of the listed CfJs until this passes.

Clucky:

10-22-2011 20:01:01 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

10-22-2011 20:01:11 UTC

for

Shadowclaw:

10-22-2011 20:12:57 UTC

for

omd:

10-22-2011 20:24:28 UTC

for

Hix:

10-22-2011 20:31:25 UTC

Sorry all, but “12/18/08” has timed out and automatically fails.

Josh:

10-22-2011 21:05:54 UTC

for

Ornithopter:

10-22-2011 21:08:47 UTC

It’s faster at this point to vote it through with no effect than to try and fail it.

scshunt:

10-22-2011 21:09:21 UTC

against because clearly blognomic wants this to happen and I’m apparently an evil invading agoran

Roujo:

10-22-2011 21:18:48 UTC

for

Prince Anduril:

10-22-2011 21:25:25 UTC

for

Doesn’t it have to be all or nothing? Surely the proposal does nothing if *any* of these aren’t here.

Ornithopter:

10-22-2011 21:27:40 UTC

Explains issue in flavor text. CfJ is legal.

Ely:

10-22-2011 21:29:13 UTC

Is this CfJ legal? “The post shall go on to describe the issue”. This doesn’t.

Roujo:

10-22-2011 21:30:46 UTC

“Conceptually will close out the CfJ’s which have no chance of passing and are only furthering to divide the group of nomic players.”

That could count, right?

zuff:

10-22-2011 21:34:39 UTC

Flavour text is not part of the post. This CfJ _is_ illegal.

ChronosPhaenon:

10-22-2011 21:39:16 UTC

for