Thursday, September 06, 2018

Proposal: [Cleanup] non-ambigious

Timed out and enacted, four votes to none. Josh

Adminned at 08 Sep 2018 10:42:08 UTC

If the proposal hyperlinked here https://blognomic.com/archive/the_past_is_prorogue has not passed, this proposal does nothing.

If a quorum of Apes’ EVC have the text “gene-choice” do the following:

Change “An Ape may spend 1 Legacy to select a Gene that was part of their own Genetics at the time of the most recent New Generation Event and add it to their current Genetics.” to

An Ape may spend 1 Legacy to select a Gene that was part of their own Genetics at the time of the most recent New Generation Event and add it to their current Genetics in a Gene slot of their choice.


Otherwise
Change “An Ape may spend 1 Legacy to select a Gene that was part of their own Genetics at the time of the most recent New Generation Event and add it to their current Genetics.” to

An Ape may spend 1 Legacy to select a Gene that was part of their own Genetics at the time of the most recent New Generation Event and add it to their current Genetics in the same Gene slot as it was last Generation.

clearing up ambiguity while barely changing the rule seems like it would be something a Cleanup proposal should be used for

Comments

Kevan: he/him

06-09-2018 07:59:59 UTC

for

Josh: Observer he/they

06-09-2018 12:04:40 UTC

against I would be happy with either of those changes but the EVC clause makes it hard to know which one I’m voting for.

Kevan: he/him

06-09-2018 12:52:26 UTC

The rider here is the better-than-usual “quorum of Apes’ EVC”, so if you’re happy with the default you may as well support the proposal. (If a quorum of players want to see the rider, it could pass as a separate proposal without you anyway.)

But anyone who doesn’t like the default is out of luck here, as there’s no way to give rider-only support to this proposal.

Josh: Observer he/they

06-09-2018 14:01:56 UTC

Fair point. COV for gene-choice

Axemabaro:

07-09-2018 00:28:02 UTC

for