Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Proposal: Cliche Ranking

Timed out with quorum of against -Darknight

Adminned at 13 Feb 2009 20:41:39 UTC

Make a new rule, “Ranks”:

Each Soldier has a Rank, tracked in the GNDT. Some Ranks have prerequisites, and if a Soldier meets the prerequisites for a Rank, they may change their Rank to any Rank they meet the prerequisites for. The following are valid Ranks:

*General
*Private: The Soldier does not met the prerequisites for any Rank other than Private.

Set all Soldiers’ Ranks to Private. Set Amnistar’s rank to General.

If at least half of all comments containing counted votes on this proposal also contain the text “Onward to victory”, add the following to the end of rule “Ranks”:

If a Soldier (other than the General)‘s Rank is General, they achieve victory.

posted by Klisz at 11 Feb 2009 23:59:00 UTC Comments (23)

Comments

Klisz: Idle

12-02-2009 00:05:50 UTC

for  Explicit author for. Onward to victory!

Devenger: Idle

12-02-2009 00:07:59 UTC

for Backward to defeat. Can we modify this later for the rank-ability stuff?

Rodlen: Idle

12-02-2009 00:08:38 UTC

imperial

Hix: Idle

12-02-2009 00:14:15 UTC

against There is absolutely no need to confuse things by including a “General” rank.

arthexis: he/himIdle

12-02-2009 00:23:59 UTC

for There is

Sparrow: Idle

12-02-2009 00:25:45 UTC

for

Qwazukee: Idle

12-02-2009 01:26:53 UTC

imperial

Clucky: he/him

12-02-2009 02:20:56 UTC

against Early victory conditions are never a good thing.

Sparrow: Idle

12-02-2009 02:25:02 UTC

CoV imperial

Klisz: Idle

12-02-2009 03:19:33 UTC

Cluck: That’s why I made it optional.

Sparrow: Idle

12-02-2009 03:23:56 UTC

Un-CoV CoV for

Darknight: he/him

12-02-2009 04:04:27 UTC

imperial “Onward to victory”

SingularByte: he/him

12-02-2009 11:01:10 UTC

for

Kevan: Concierge he/him

12-02-2009 11:10:36 UTC

against As Hix.

Plus the usual reluctance to vote for a proposal that waves through a second proposal that would only require a quarter of players to be in favour of it.

Wooden Squid: Idle

12-02-2009 17:50:00 UTC

for

Elias IX: Idle

12-02-2009 23:18:05 UTC

for 7 for, 3 against, 3 unresolved deferential.

Of the 13 comments containing counted votes thus far, 2 have the special phrase.

ais523:

13-02-2009 18:59:25 UTC

against. Arguably, this would lead to an instant victory scam; given that General has no prerequisites, by the standard definition of “prerequisites” a player meets the prerequisites for it, even if they don’t have any. So when a new rank is added that does have prerequisites, a player meets the prerequisites for some rank they have the prerequisites for, so they can change their rank to General and win. (At the moment, meeting the nonexistent prereqs for General means players don’t meet the prereqs for Private…)

Devenger: Idle

13-02-2009 19:11:57 UTC

imperial my head hurts, but I think you are right

Klisz: Idle

13-02-2009 20:14:18 UTC

ais523: The General victory thing is optional.

Igthorn: Idle

13-02-2009 20:36:30 UTC

against

Amnistar: he/himIdle

13-02-2009 20:45:45 UTC

against

I’m okay with the general idea, I’d rather there be a requirement to be a general from the begning though.

TrumanCapote: Idle

14-02-2009 00:18:13 UTC

against

Sparrow: Idle

14-02-2009 00:53:41 UTC

Un-un-CoV CoV against