Tuesday, August 31, 2021

Proposal: communications clarity

Timed Out. Passes 7-0—Clucky

Adminned at 03 Sep 2021 02:10:41 UTC

In the rule “Communications”, replace “Review it against the list of Censorship Terms.” with “Review the Communication’s Message against the list of Censorship Terms.” and “Send the censored message to all Cells on the Intended Recipients list” with “Send the censored Message individually to each of the Cells on the Intended Recipients list”.

so that its clear that the recipients of a communication are neither sent nor censored alongside the message itself!!

Comments

Clucky: he/him

31-08-2021 23:18:34 UTC

Does this solve the problem?

The EE messaging system reveals the recipient list to everyone the message goes to.

If we don’t want the list to be revealed to the people who get the message, I think we need to specify that Josh has to send individual messages.

lemon: she/her

01-09-2021 00:05:23 UTC

huh, i wasn’t aware!! edit made, then; i think if the sender isn’t known, neither should the other recipients be

Janet: she/her

01-09-2021 03:34:04 UTC

for

Kevan: City he/him

01-09-2021 09:02:55 UTC

for

Brendan: he/him

01-09-2021 16:06:10 UTC

for

Raven1207: he/they

01-09-2021 19:06:16 UTC

for

Josh: he/they

01-09-2021 19:17:07 UTC

for