Wednesday, March 02, 2022

Proposal: Convolutioncentives

Timed out 3 votes to 4. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 04 Mar 2022 17:20:04 UTC

Append to the atomic action defined in the rule “Parallel Dynastic Histories” the following:

* Set their own Cresi Cube to Powered.


Clucky: he/him

02-03-2022 19:48:19 UTC

This is currently a free action, right? Seems maybe too strong

Brendan: he/him

02-03-2022 20:36:48 UTC

It’s a weekly action.

Josh: he/they

02-03-2022 21:50:42 UTC


Roujo: he/him

02-03-2022 23:52:50 UTC

Is “Parallel Player Lists” a subrule of “Parallel Dynastic Histories”, and more to the point: is the text of the former considered to be part of the latter?

I consider the answer to that question to be “Yes”, since I’d interpret a proposal to “replace all instances of ‘parallel dynasty’ with ‘a suffusion of yellow’ in the text of the rule ‘Parallel Dynastic Histories’” to do that replacement in the subrule as well. What do you all think?

I ask because I see two atomic actions here, one of which being in the child rule, and the proposal refers to “atomic action” in the singular. 👀

Brendan: he/him

03-03-2022 00:46:14 UTC

It’s a fair point. But this is often the kind of thing left to admin discretion, and the singular backs up the idea that it’s only the action defined in the parent rule, not the subrule. (Which is certainly what I intended.)


03-03-2022 04:18:47 UTC

I saw Rouju’s comment and immediately wrote up Subrule Extrication to fix such issues in the future. Go vote, it needs quorum!

Kevan: City he/him

03-03-2022 20:03:14 UTC

against Cresi Cube timing already seems opaque without adding an additional “oh and once per week” recharge.

Clucky: he/him

04-03-2022 04:45:09 UTC



04-03-2022 08:29:57 UTC


Lulu: she/her

04-03-2022 11:06:26 UTC



04-03-2022 13:25:04 UTC