Proposal: Convolutioncentives
Timed out 3 votes to 4. Failed by Kevan.
Adminned at 04 Mar 2022 17:20:04 UTC
Append to the atomic action defined in the rule “Parallel Dynastic Histories” the following:
* Set their own Cresi Cube to Powered.
Timed out 3 votes to 4. Failed by Kevan.
Adminned at 04 Mar 2022 17:20:04 UTC
Append to the atomic action defined in the rule “Parallel Dynastic Histories” the following:
* Set their own Cresi Cube to Powered.
Is “Parallel Player Lists” a subrule of “Parallel Dynastic Histories”, and more to the point: is the text of the former considered to be part of the latter?
I consider the answer to that question to be “Yes”, since I’d interpret a proposal to “replace all instances of ‘parallel dynasty’ with ‘a suffusion of yellow’ in the text of the rule ‘Parallel Dynastic Histories’” to do that replacement in the subrule as well. What do you all think?
I ask because I see two atomic actions here, one of which being in the child rule, and the proposal refers to “atomic action” in the singular. 👀
It’s a fair point. But this is often the kind of thing left to admin discretion, and the singular backs up the idea that it’s only the action defined in the parent rule, not the subrule. (Which is certainly what I intended.)
I saw Rouju’s comment and immediately wrote up Subrule Extrication to fix such issues in the future. Go vote, it needs quorum!
Cresi Cube timing already seems opaque without adding an additional “oh and once per week” recharge.
Clucky: he/him
This is currently a free action, right? Seems maybe too strong