Thursday, August 26, 2021

Proposal: [Core] Opus Remand Exemplar

Timed out and failed, 4-4. Josh

This did not fail 4-4. Ais, cuddlebeam, vovix, raven and Chiiika all voted for this. I think Josh missed Chiiika’s vote. Actually passed 5-4—Clucky

Actually fails as proposals that amend core can’t pass without quorum votes, which seems wild to me but hey hi. Josh

Adminned at 29 Aug 2021 08:19:57 UTC

Appends a point under “Whenever a Proposal not authored by the Wielder of Vetoes is Enacted or Failed, then:”

If the Proposal is Passed and if the Proposal is less than 50 words; it’s author gains 2 Empathy.

In Fair Play, change

All Workers and idle Workers should be aware of

into

All Legislators and idle Legislators should be aware of

Appends the following under the Mandate List:

It has a length of less than 200 words.

Remodel, also dangling a rider for a typo.

No idea for the short forms, but I’m fairly certain Core is a word.

Comments

Josh: he/they

26-08-2021 08:04:03 UTC

Hm, I wish the core fix was a separate proposal from the dynastic change.

ais523:

26-08-2021 14:59:59 UTC

for

ais523:

26-08-2021 21:52:55 UTC

@Josh: If people needed to spend a slot on simple core fixes like this (rather than having them as part of another proposal or doing them via CFJ), they probably wouldn’t do them at all.

ais523:

26-08-2021 21:53:52 UTC

Also, to get an idea of numbers: this proposal is 77 words long.

Clucky: he/him

26-08-2021 22:33:06 UTC

against not a fan of limiting the size of proposals, especially considering the lack of activity over the past couple of days. I think this dynasty could use some cool new ideas to shake things up a bit, and limiting the size of proposals will just make that less likely to happen.

Josh: he/they

26-08-2021 22:39:24 UTC

@ais No disrespect to chiiika but there’s plenty of players who aren’t exactly maximising the utilisation of their slots

Josh: he/they

27-08-2021 09:39:35 UTC

against I like the core change but not the dynastic

Darknight: he/him

27-08-2021 10:00:05 UTC

against

Madrid:

27-08-2021 13:35:57 UTC

for

Trapdoorspyder: he/him

27-08-2021 19:55:42 UTC

against I’d rather not have to deal with a proposal size limit. I’d be willing to revisit the idea with a different thing being added to the list.

Vovix: he/him

28-08-2021 04:11:11 UTC

for Brevity is the soul of wit, as they say

Raven1207: he/they

28-08-2021 06:02:19 UTC

for