I don’t like daily actions but I’m otherwise not opposed to this.

> or any Legislator if the Legislator with their name bolded in this property is Idle

if they’re idle, they’re not a “Legislator with their name bolded in this property”, so they can’t be replaced.

Also, I think it would be better for this to be publicly tracked, rather than modifying rules text.

Wouldn’t this just lock the game if someone hands off to a person who is about to go idle?

No.

Maybe it could help with all of the double, triple-negatives to think of “A proposal is a Misfit if it does not have all of the properties on the following list:” as “A proposal is Clean if it has all of the properties on the following list:”.

No, it just prevents that specific idle person from making proposals until they start acting again, which doesn’t seem like a problem?

I guess I just don’t see the fun in “Sorry you can’t make proposals for 36 hours” 

Actually, this looks like it’s a no-op due to Names: “a word only refers to the name of a Legislator if it is explicitly stated that it refers to a Legislator’s name”. It’d work fine as “The Proposal’s Author is not named X”, but it doesn’t jump through the extra hoop.

The later bits don’t help - they substitute in a name, but admit that what’s there might not be a name.

I disagree with this proposal and think it should maybe be vetoed or self-killed on Bucky’s point about functionality but I am going to vote because I want that sweet sweet empo baby