Monday, May 10, 2010

Proposal: Damn you, CK digraph!

SKed. Ien.

Adminned at 12 May 2010 12:49:05 UTC

After “The Vote will count as the same as the Victorious Blognomicker’s Vote” add “If a Blognomicker votes DEFERENTIAL on his own proposal, and the Victorious Blognomicker votes against, the proposal counts as being self-killed.”

Since Vitamin K passed. Also, making it a proposal because there was no real reason to make it a CfJ.

Comments

Ienpw III:

05-10-2010 17:25:00 UTC

against The CFJs already provide for this change. And Qwaz and I “actively disagree” on the interpretation of the rules, and it was in need of immediate attention, so that we could admin the proposal in question correctly.

Klisz:

05-10-2010 17:49:40 UTC

@Ienpw III: I realize as much, but as for the first part, I’m doing this because people keep thinking that the CfJs add the clarification twice.

Ienpw III:

05-10-2010 18:01:42 UTC

Ah. Wasted proposal slot if you ask me. You could’ve just posted it in comments to the CFJs.

Kevan: HE/HIM

05-10-2010 18:02:08 UTC

The CfJs could both fail, but if one passes, this proposal will add the clarification a second time. If the other passes, this proposal will contradict it…

against

Bucky:

05-10-2010 20:10:21 UTC

for

SeerPenguin:

05-10-2010 20:49:15 UTC

against

Qwazukee:

05-10-2010 21:28:58 UTC

against

Klisz:

05-10-2010 21:35:20 UTC

against  Self-kill, per Kevan.

Klisz:

05-10-2010 21:35:57 UTC

Ienpw: I did. No-one listened.

muiro:

05-11-2010 13:20:09 UTC

for

Klisz:

05-11-2010 16:07:18 UTC

muiro: This has been self-killed; there is no need for more votes (there isn’t a way to make this pass anyway).