BlogNomic: The First Dynasty of Desertfrog

I accidentally self-killed a proposal made by Prince Anduril, but I think its unfair that he loses the SP due to that.

I am torn on this - one hand, I have been hurt by it more than anyone else- on the other hand, i think the prisoner’s dilemma is a good balance to factions. I really want a way to prevent it from happening *on accident*.

SPC: Problem here is that there is no Prisoner’s dilemma. So far no one has done any single representation proposal including someone that they think might fail their proposal on purpose, all have been accidents.

Just for the representation. I felt it was petty to vote against every proposal I wasn’t represented in. But this is a much more mature way of doing things. Take note fellow proposers.

@arthexis, very true - but the concept is there. I’d like to see it happen, just not to me ;). Perhaps we need to find a way to make that benefit the traitor - again, i’m not opposed to your proposal, but torn.

Actually, CoV since it has no effect. Representation says “it counts as if the author had voted AGAINST”

Coppro: It does have effect, the point is fixing who loses the SP. Right now the rule states that the author loses it, doesn’t matter if someone else voted as if they where the author.

Coppro: The simple fact that we are thorn over the correct interpretation should be sufficient justification to make the rule read more clearly in that regard.

Scammable. (You make a dictatorship proposal representing everyone, then nobody can vote against it without losing an SP.)

arthexis: You’re missing my point. Your proposed text is in the DBCS rule, and in that rule it counts as if the author voted against it. So the vote that did the SK was, in fact, the author’s.

coppro: If you were right, then ais523’s supposed scam doesn’t work. Only one of you two can be right.

per ais523.

arthexis: either way this should be voted down

Well, fine S/K