Proposal: Dead men have no claims
Timed out / withdrawn. Failed by Kevan.
Adminned at 05 Dec 2023 17:08:45 UTC
If the proposal “Shoving Aside” was enacted, this proposal has no effect.
Add a new subrule under the rule “Succession”, titled “Assassination”, with the following content:
As an Act of Subterfude, a Heir may, as an weekly action, Assassinate, which is an atomic action with the following steps:
*Choose a Heir who is not the Heir performing this action and is not Vigilant.
*Nominate a Successor for the targeted Heir, following the steps described under the rule “Successors”.Each Heir is either Relaxed or Vigilant, defaulting to Relaxed. This state is publicly tracked. As a daily action, a Heir may change their state from Relaxed to Vigilant or vise versa and increase their Stress by one. A Heir’s Stress is a publicly tracked number defaulting to zero. As a Daily Communal Action, an Heir may Update Stress. When an Heir Updates Stress, they increase the Stress of each Vigilant Heir by 1 unless that Heir became Vigilant that day, and decrease the Stress of each Relaxed Heir by 1 unless that Heir became Relaxed that day.
In the end of the rule “Transition of Power” add:
For the purposes of this rule, a Heir’s Claim’s strength is considered to be the value written for that Claim’s strength in the ruleset minus the Heir’s Stress.
A deterministic alternative for assassination
SingularByte: he/him
Is there any kind of cost to this? As far as I can tell, there’s basically no reason *not* to assassinate every week that it becomes available.