Fails 2-5 with less than Quorum (5) not voting AGAINST -Bucky
Adminned at 01 Aug 2016 21:28:13 UTC
In the rule “[LDB] Leaders’ Debates”, change the text
and was named in at least one comment on it by at least one other Scribe
to
and was named in comments by at least as many other Scribes as the other Demagogues
A Scribe shouldn’t be able to single-handedly set the result of the debate to “everyone Scores”
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Comments
Larrytheturtle:
GenericPerson:
I didn’t think the post would do what it did, so I wasn’t expecting to score. I am somewhat biased I suppose, having benefited from the scam, but I agree with Larry here.
GenericPerson:
Honestly, I’m not really playing to win this game. I’ve not got any good dynasty ideas, though I have been doing some thinking on the subject just in case.
Sci_Guy12:
Larrytheturtle:
@gp you can always pass the dynasty if you want after you win. That way you can still focus on winning without feeling obligated to lead a dynasty.
Bucky:
This dynasty is a decent candidate for a repeat theme; in that case we’d keep Apocrypha and all the rules it references (Grading, Provisional Rules and Paper Money) but repeal all the Apocryphal stuff and the rules that support them.
qwertyu63:
Clucky: he/him
Brendan: he/him