Saturday, July 30, 2016

Proposal: Debate Draws

Fails 2-5 with less than Quorum (5) not voting AGAINST -Bucky

Adminned at 01 Aug 2016 21:28:13 UTC

In the rule “[LDB] Leaders’ Debates”, change the text

and was named in at least one comment on it by at least one other Scribe


and was named in comments by at least as many other Scribes as the other Demagogues

A Scribe shouldn’t be able to single-handedly set the result of the debate to “everyone Scores”



30-07-2016 21:23:23 UTC

against I disagree when several people already benefited from it. I will only support if I removes the scores from people.


30-07-2016 21:39:05 UTC

I didn’t think the post would do what it did, so I wasn’t expecting to score. I am somewhat biased I suppose, having benefited from the scam, but I agree with Larry here.  against


30-07-2016 21:40:25 UTC

Honestly, I’m not really playing to win this game. I’ve not got any good dynasty ideas, though I have been doing some thinking on the subject just in case.


30-07-2016 22:53:37 UTC



31-07-2016 03:02:43 UTC

@gp you can always pass the dynasty if you want after you win.  That way you can still focus on winning without feeling obligated to lead a dynasty.


31-07-2016 19:22:25 UTC

This dynasty is a decent candidate for a repeat theme; in that case we’d keep Apocrypha and all the rules it references (Grading, Provisional Rules and Paper Money) but repeal all the Apocryphal stuff and the rules that support them.


31-07-2016 23:37:32 UTC


Clucky: he/him

31-07-2016 23:58:37 UTC


Brendan: he/him

01-08-2016 17:53:49 UTC

against per Larry.