Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Debate on Motion to Declare Party Affiliation - 19:55, 26 Feb 2007 (GMT)

Whereas every Iudex has eir own agenda, and

whereas every agenda is supported by many Iudices; therefore

I move the adoption of the following resolution, A new text field will be entered into the GDNT with the title “Political Affiliation”. Any actor with this field blank is considered to have “No Political Affiliation”. An Iudex may change eir Political Affiliation Often, to either: (Party Name) Leader - as long as their exist no other Iudex with this Political Affiliation, or (Party Name) Member - as long as their exist an Iudex with the Political Affiliation (Party Name) Leader, where (Party Name) is replaced by any string.

I’m not entirely sure what I’m supposed to put in the body…so I put in the actual motion

posted by Amnistar at 27 Feb 2007 01:33:00 UTC Comments (16)

Comments

BabylonJasmine:

27-02-2007 01:49:55 UTC

I am in favor of this motion, and as soon as I am added to active players i will vote in favor of it.  It strikes me as quite in the flavor of the dynasty.

ChronosPhaenon:

27-02-2007 02:19:19 UTC

Baylon, sp. in this dynasty, you don’t vote in the comments. You have to wait debate to close and then vote in the Motions page.

BabylonJasmine:

27-02-2007 02:36:58 UTC

Alright then,  I won’t vote as soon as I am added.  I still see this as very much in the flavor of the dynasty and a valuable addition to the ruleset.

spikebrennan:

27-02-2007 02:55:49 UTC

I second the motion.

BabylonJasmine:

27-02-2007 03:06:27 UTC

I believe Chronos already seconded the motion, which is why it was able to move into discussion.

Amnistar: he/him

27-02-2007 03:34:53 UTC

indeed, at this point comments are for potential problems with the motion, or a desire to expand the effects of the motion…or to just add another effect to a motion already in progress.

Seebo:

27-02-2007 03:51:18 UTC

“Any actor” >_>

ChronosPhaenon:

27-02-2007 10:50:45 UTC

That’s what Motions to Amend are for. I just moved one, it needs a seconder.

ChronosPhaenon:

27-02-2007 11:31:02 UTC

“Interrupted until appreciation of Secondary Motion to Substitute the Word Actor - 10:46, 27 Feb 2007 (GMT) ”

Hix:

27-02-2007 15:37:52 UTC

Interrupted until appreciation of Secondary Motion to Substitue the Word Actor - 10:46, 27 Feb 2007 (GMT)

Hix:

27-02-2007 15:40:13 UTC

There.  NOW debate is interrupted.  Josh’s seconding of the Subsidiary Motion was not valid, as e did not properly interrupt Debate (e had 4 hours to do it, so I’ll assume e forgot).

Hix:

28-02-2007 20:52:11 UTC

Interrupted until appreciation of Secondary Motion to define a Majority Party - 19:38, 28 Feb 2007 (GMT)

Hix:

02-03-2007 01:29:52 UTC

Interrupted until appreciation of Secondary Motion to add Political Affiliation to voting - 17:54, 1 Mar 2007 (GMT)

Hix:

04-03-2007 22:54:15 UTC

Debate Resumed

Amnistar: he/him

06-03-2007 00:28:23 UTC

Debate Closed

BabylonJasmine:

07-03-2007 02:31:18 UTC

Now that this has been adopted someone needs to implement it in the GDNT