Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Proposal: Deciding if Theft is Trivial is not for the Thief to Decide

I’ll consider this proposal Self-killed (and -2 Excalabur BTW)—arth

Adminned at 21 Oct 2009 13:45:18 UTC

To the last paragraph of 2.2 Ruleset Theft, add the sentence ‘A Theft proposal shall not be considered Trivial unless half of the EVCs on the proposal contain the string “Trivial”.’

It bugs me to see people hedge their thefts with allegations of Triviality.

Comments

Josh:

10-20-2009 12:29:39 UTC

for Now that people can nix their own proposal, no reason not to.

Josh:

10-20-2009 12:31:25 UTC

COV: I prefer Kevan’s, really.  against

Excalabur:

10-20-2009 12:38:39 UTC

EAV imperial Trivial.  Sigh.

Kevan:

10-20-2009 12:40:48 UTC

against Evidently capturing the spirit of the times, though.

arthexis:

10-20-2009 14:08:19 UTC

against Trivial

Bucky:

10-20-2009 16:12:37 UTC

against S-K

Kevan:

10-20-2009 16:18:50 UTC

S-K?

Oze:

10-20-2009 17:32:24 UTC

against

Bucky:

10-20-2009 19:17:25 UTC

Kevan:The author voted DEF and I’m the Acting Leader.

Darknight:

10-20-2009 23:20:31 UTC

against @Bucky: I think thats the first time i’ve seen a proposal get SKed do to a DEF vote lol.

Excalabur:

10-21-2009 00:33:39 UTC

old old precedent says that that doesn’t S-K the proposal.  However, we may or may not remember that.

Ienpw III:

10-21-2009 01:37:17 UTC

against

Qwazukee:

10-21-2009 02:24:12 UTC

I’ve seen a few Proposals self-killed that way, it does count (or it has the 3 or so times I remember).