Timed Out. Fails 2-4—Clucky
Adminned at 03 Apr 2021 03:49:53 UTC
Replace “Devil: the Heft of all Cards in the opponent’s Pocket are reduced by 5 (to a minimum of zero each)” with
Devil: the Heft of all Cards in the opponent’s Pocket are reduced by 2 (to a minimum of -1 each).
Well, the only realistic way to Verme the Devil here is to have three Arcana, the -1 is just a little flavor.
This Devil is less Luciferian and more like getting hassled by an Imp. It’s possible to complete a Toro. But there’s a good chance it’ll wreck someone’s plans and make them mad. Also, even if it’s significantly weaker it’s still, at worst, easily better than the Universos and I’d want it over Lightning, maybe even over World.
@Jumble is it? Devil’s top-tier Arcana I think. Puts an easy stop to any Toros and Arias.
Hefts can’t go negative, as currently written. (“If a set of valid values is not specified in their definition, game variables defined to hold numeric values can hold only non-negative integers.”)
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Clucky: he/him
hrm… does the “min of -1” make devil stronger or weaker? It does mean you can Verme the devil. But overall I think this makes the devil a bit too weak.
For the purposes of Arias, this is like playing a six. So its not very good at blocking Arias, it doesn’t help blocking Vermes, and while it possibly disrupts Toros and -2 its still very possible to still complete a Toro. As such, while I agree the current devil probably needs to be fixed this might be too weak?