Sunday, January 24, 2010

Proposal: Did it work or not?

Self-killed. -Ornithopter

Adminned at 25 Jan 2010 21:06:15 UTC

After the text “If the Lights are Off and the Executor has any unprocessed Dark Lists in his email inbox which were sent since the Lights last went Off, and whose sender is not Dormant, he may select one of these Lists at random and process it” in the ruleset, append the following: “. He shall then inform the sender of that list that his list has been processed”.

Comments

There:

24-01-2010 04:40:33 UTC

for

Klisz:

24-01-2010 05:04:58 UTC

imperial

alethiophile:

24-01-2010 05:52:32 UTC

for

Oze:

24-01-2010 08:53:21 UTC

imperial

Kevan: he/him

24-01-2010 10:11:55 UTC

against Not entirely sure that the effort is worth the reward. A little mystery doesn’t hurt.

Darknight: he/him

24-01-2010 10:48:51 UTC

imperial

Anonyman:

24-01-2010 12:06:31 UTC

imperial and therefore against

Purplebeard:

24-01-2010 13:37:10 UTC

imperial

Keba:

24-01-2010 14:03:18 UTC

imperial

Hix:

24-01-2010 16:16:15 UTC

against

spikebrennan:

24-01-2010 16:16:45 UTC

imperial

Greytyphoon:

24-01-2010 16:53:47 UTC

against We can know in what order the lists have been processed by looking in the GNDT for the update that is made by Kevan when the lights turn on.

Ornithopter:

24-01-2010 17:07:44 UTC

imperial

Roujo: he/him

24-01-2010 18:32:58 UTC

against Per Kevan

Kevan: he/him

24-01-2010 18:57:06 UTC

[Greytyphoon] No, I deliberately don’t update the GNDT locations in the same order as the lists (the first time was in a random order, the second time was alphabetical). I don’t think it makes much difference, but didn’t want to give away any information that the ruleset didn’t require me to.

Klisz:

24-01-2010 19:11:06 UTC

against

TrumanCapote:

24-01-2010 20:05:10 UTC

against

redtara: they/them

24-01-2010 20:19:14 UTC

S/K to speed up the queue by 12 hours. against