Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Proposal: You and what Money?

Failed 5 votes to 1. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 22 Jul 2014 13:14:16 UTC

If the proposal “PvP Haggling” is not passed, this proposal has no effect.
Otherwise, modify “The Broker or any Seller may respond to a Flea Market post specifying an Offer in Pounds that he is willing to give for the Good.” to read “The Broker or any Seller with a positive Profit may respond to a Flea Market post specifying an Offer in Pounds up to and including their current Profit that they are willing to give for the Good.”

Grammars, and making it so you can’t go broker than broke. Remember when we used e to represent the arbitrary gender pronoun?

Comments

Kevan: Oracle he/him

22-07-2014 09:42:58 UTC

against Because the Broker does not have a Profit value.

PTSnoop_:

22-07-2014 10:12:11 UTC

against Trouble is, we’re all already broker than broke. I’d prefer this rule if it had a cutoff at £-50 (like the attic-searching rule), but £0 would just have the effect of blocking all player offers for the near future. I approve of the nongenderspecification, though.

King:

22-07-2014 10:15:54 UTC

imperial

Purplebeard:

22-07-2014 11:54:35 UTC

against

RaichuKFM: she/her

22-07-2014 13:34:07 UTC

against