Friday, March 20, 2020

Proposal: Discovery Channel

Timed out 4-3. Josh

Adminned at 23 Mar 2020 10:17:44 UTC

In the rule “Auctions” replace

Determining the Winner of each Item in that Auction. A Desirable Item’s Winner is the Nobleman who made the highest bid of Money plus Adjusted Power, which is the Power bid multiplied by the Weighted Power Factor, for it (in the event of a tie, highest Power wins; if it is still a tie then the Item has no Winner). An Undesirable Item’s Winner is the Nobleman who made the lowest bid of Money plus Power for it (in the event of a tie, lowest Power wins; if it is still a tie then the tie is resolved in a secretly random manner by the Louis XIV).

with

Determining the Winner of each Item in that Auction. A Desirable Item’s Winner is the Nobleman who made the highest bid of Money plus Adjusted Power, which is the Power bid (plus one if the Nobleman created the inspiration which the item was created from) multiplied by the Weighted Power Factor, for it (in the event of a tie, highest Adjusted Power wins; if it is still a tie then the Item has no Winner). An Undesirable Item’s Winner is the Nobleman who made the lowest bid of Money plus Adjusted Power for it (in the event of a tie, lowest Adjusted Power wins; if it is still a tie then the tie is resolved in a secretly random manner by the Louis XIV).

No one is creating items. Rather than simply reward people for creating items directly, lets just give them a boost to their bids. That way there is still incentive to create items but its not as game changing.

Comments

Josh: Observer he/they

20-03-2020 17:57:56 UTC

“plus one of the Nobleman” - of should be if I think?

naught:

20-03-2020 18:20:28 UTC

It might be a good idea to put that whole clause in parentheses, I think; it reads more easily that way.

Clucky: he/him

20-03-2020 18:30:46 UTC

fixed thanks

Josh: Observer he/they

21-03-2020 17:22:43 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

21-03-2020 18:43:31 UTC

for

naught:

21-03-2020 19:25:41 UTC

for

TyGuy6:

21-03-2020 22:30:46 UTC

against Tracking this feels like a nightmare.

Kevan: he/him

21-03-2020 23:39:46 UTC

against This does seem like more unnecessary complexity.

Josh: Observer he/they

22-03-2020 08:01:36 UTC

Ambiguous as written whether or not the additional one power then still gets deducted from the Nobleman’s power totaly anyway as written.

Brendan: he/him

22-03-2020 14:55:12 UTC

against