Call for Judgment: Do-over
Reached quorum 4 votes to 1. Enacted by Kevan.
Adminned at 07 Aug 2023 07:49:58 UTC
If CfJ: Displaying Much Ingenuity was enacted, revert its effects.
Revert any changes made to the personal gamestate of the Districts named “Josh” or “Lendunistus” as a result of their Reaction to Dilemma #2. Uphold that those Reactions took place. For each of those Districts respectively, if their EVC to the CfJ names a single Outcome from Dilemma #2, apply the Upside and Downside of that Outcome to that District.
Lendun and I miss out due to the resource switch faff in Dilemma #2. This is just a straight do-over.
Heating
i’m not sure that this is fair or necessary at all? y’all got a minor downside — really just a forced neutral play, since you didn’t even lose defenses — on account of not noticing a rules interaction between a proposal and a game mechanic! how is this not just arbitrarily reverting a bit of nomic gameplay that happened to not go in your favour? as the person responsible (i both made that proposal, and then noticed the interaction and started working on quietly enacting the proposal queue instead of saying something about it) i feel a bit shortchanged, and i think this sets a worrying precedent.
lendunistus: he/him
my name is lendunistus, not Lendun
looks good otherwise