Friday, June 15, 2012

Proposal: Don’t worship false gods

Vetoed. -scshunt

Adminned at 17 Jun 2012 15:45:22 UTC

Every Time Monk who is a Time Buddha stop being a Time Buddha, so that the current Dynasty be a Metadynasty.

Either that or we can keep coming up with different interpretations of what happened and who is the Time Buddha and what Dynasty we’re in.

Comments

Clucky: he/him

15-06-2012 22:56:39 UTC

against only does anything if we also repeal all the rules. Otherwise anyone who is in dynasty 71 will cause DN to become Time Buddah

Spice:

16-06-2012 00:43:13 UTC

against A Time Buddha is not a Time Monk, so there is no Time Monk who is a Time Buddha.

Clucky: he/him

16-06-2012 00:49:51 UTC

The Time Buddah is only not a time monk for certain dynastic rules. They are still generally a Time Monk

Cpt_Koen:

16-06-2012 00:52:17 UTC

A Time Buddha is indeed a Time Monk.
Rule 2.1 reads:
“The Time Buddha does not count as a Time Monk for the purposes of any other Dynastic Rule, except where that Rule specifically refers to the Time Buddha.”
“The Time Buddha is Not a Time Monk” is only the name of this rule, and the appendix at 3.3.2 specifies:
“The names of rules are not themselves rule text and have no effect other than being rule names.”

Clucky: I disagree. Just because one Time Monk is subject to the Dynastic Rules from Dynasty 71 doesn’t mean Darknight is the Time Buddha. Besides, this Proposal’s sole purpose is to make sure we’re not wrong about who’s a Time Buddha, not to prevent Darknight from ever becoming a Time Buddha again.

(Just so you know, I posted this as a response to http://blognomic.com/archive/btw_darknight_is_still_time_buddah/ and didn’t realize your call for judgement already covered the issue.)

Josh: Observer he/they

16-06-2012 07:12:00 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

16-06-2012 16:19:50 UTC

against

Bucky:

16-06-2012 22:07:31 UTC

for

Rodney:

17-06-2012 20:02:44 UTC

imperial

scshunt:

17-06-2012 20:15:00 UTC

veto (see first post for details)