Vetoed. -scshunt
Adminned at 17 Jun 2012 15:45:22 UTC
Every Time Monk who is a Time Buddha stop being a Time Buddha, so that the current Dynasty be a Metadynasty.
Either that or we can keep coming up with different interpretations of what happened and who is the Time Buddha and what Dynasty we’re in.
A Time Buddha is not a Time Monk, so there is no Time Monk who is a Time Buddha.
The Time Buddah is only not a time monk for certain dynastic rules. They are still generally a Time Monk
A Time Buddha is indeed a Time Monk.
Rule 2.1 reads:
“The Time Buddha does not count as a Time Monk for the purposes of any other Dynastic Rule, except where that Rule specifically refers to the Time Buddha.”
“The Time Buddha is Not a Time Monk” is only the name of this rule, and the appendix at 3.3.2 specifies:
“The names of rules are not themselves rule text and have no effect other than being rule names.”
Clucky: I disagree. Just because one Time Monk is subject to the Dynastic Rules from Dynasty 71 doesn’t mean Darknight is the Time Buddha. Besides, this Proposal’s sole purpose is to make sure we’re not wrong about who’s a Time Buddha, not to prevent Darknight from ever becoming a Time Buddha again.
(Just so you know, I posted this as a response to http://blognomic.com/archive/btw_darknight_is_still_time_buddah/ and didn’t realize your call for judgement already covered the issue.)
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
(see first post for details)
Clucky: he/him