Proposal: Duel-Wielded Bazookas… Not.
High Command respects the (ambi)dexterity of their armed forces, and disapprove of rumours in the ranks that a weapon could be too great to be held with a single hand, limb or other appendage. As a result, this proposed limit on the dual-wielding of high-ordinance weaponry has been refused and the people responsible reprimanded for their lack of faith.
Reporting, Devenger.
(Self-killed)
Adminned at 14 Feb 2009 14:35:22 UTC
Append the following to Rule, “Weapons”:
Some Weapons are Two-Handed. Unless otherwise stated, Weapons that are not Two-Handed are One-Handed. If under any circumstance a Two-Handed Weapon is carried at the same time as another Weapon, the Soldier carrying them shall immediately Lose both Weapons.
A Weapon that is Lost shall be removed from the holster of any Soldier carrying it. A Lost Weapon shall not be carried by any Soldier, but still counts against the Weapon’s availability as if it were.
A Soldier not carrying any Weapons has Both Hands Free. A Soldier carrying a single One-Handed Weapon has One Hand Free.
Two-Handed Weapons, Lost Weapons, and some Hands Free hooks for Stunt prerequisites.
Hix: