Wednesday, November 09, 2022

Proposal: Dunker’s Dilemma

Vetoed. -Bucky

Adminned at 11 Nov 2022 18:24:21 UTC

Add a new subrule to the rule “Attraction List”, call it the “Double Dunk Tank” and give it the following text;

The Double Dunk Tank is a Queue. While in the Double Dunk Tank, Visitors’s Groups may privately message the Proprietor to declare the Visitor’s intent to do one of Cover or Dunk - their Tank Action is their last intent thus messaged while the Traffic Light was Green, or Cover if their Group never sent such a message.

The Double Dunk Tank’s front effect consists of several steps:
* First, choosing the first Visitor in the queue and the next visitor who isn’t controlled by the same group as the first as the turn’s Sitters. If this selection cannot be made, skip the rest of the Front Effect.
* Each Sitter who chose Dunk Drenches the other Sitter, and each Sitter who chose Cover Protects the other Sitter.
* Finally, move the Sitters and all Visitors between them in this Queue to the Plaza.

Add a subrule “Dunker’s Dilemma” to the rule “Stamps”. Give it the following text:

A Sitter in the Dunk Tank who is Protected receives a C stamp for gaining the trust of their fellow.
A Sitter in the Dunk Tank who Drenches the other Sitter while being Protected also receives the coveted D stamp for their mastery of deception.


JonathanDark: he/him

09-11-2022 23:38:38 UTC

Any concerns about collaboration? I know that the No Collaboration rule is inactive, so collaboration is allowed, unless a proposal comes along later to reactivate it.


10-11-2022 01:36:37 UTC

The stamps are nonfunctional as written due to an error. They refer to the Dunk Tank instead of the Double Dunk Tank.

JonathanDark: he/him

10-11-2022 07:02:21 UTC

Are you planning to withdraw this proposal or fix it later?

Kevan: he/him

10-11-2022 08:51:10 UTC

against Collaboration does seem trivial, with two Stamps a significant payout.


11-11-2022 17:39:08 UTC