Hmm, I like the idea of this, and if it’s done through a volunteer system, we don’t have to worry about who should do it. One thing I would say is that if a rule is changed, the voice recording needs to be deleted until someone volunteers to do a new one, that way, there isn’t an outdated voice recording at any point. Other than that, I feel like it would just be a lot of recording and rerecording, especially when a dynasty is just starting, but it only is an option, not a requirement, so I like it. Definitely voting

probably should go in Annotated Ruleset instead of Core.

There is no way to force someone to record a change. So this could quickly get out of sync with the ruleset. (or arguably, force the admin enacting it to record something new which is a total non-starter)

Furthermore, this opens the possibility that the recorded rules say something differently than the written rule, and that could cause a whole host of problems.

I do not understand the problem this tries to solve. If you want to hear a spoken version of the rules, there are plenty of automated text to speech engines out there which you can use.

I’m not against the idea. It does use the term “sources” which is about to become deprecated, and as Clucky says, it assumed that voice recordings will change automagically when rules do. With minor tweaks I’d be for but as written i have to go

@Josh

You mean Source**R**. It doesn’t say source**S**

Sure thing, Captain corrects-typos-a-lot, it’s still not current language

Damn that was a quick response

Also I just noticed this terms for player/emperor changed so…