Tuesday, July 25, 2006

Proposal: Echos from the distant past

1-6. Cannot be enacted without CoV.—Chronos

Adminned at 26 Jul 2006 12:17:17 UTC

Unless the Arbiter votes against this proposal, add a new Core Rule to the Ruleset entitled “Katastrophe”.  Give it the following text:

There may be a Traveller who is called Katastrophe.  Katastrophe has the same abilities as the Arbiter except where the Ruleset specifically says otherwise.  Katastrophe uses a distinct Veto icon, which is called Katastrophe’s seal.  Each Veto icon may only be changed by its wielder.

The Arbiter and Katastrophe may overturn a Veto by the other.  This may only be done if all Proposals subsequent to the one vetoed are still pending.  The vetoed Proposal then reverts to pending status, and may not be vetoed again.

If Katastrophe is able to acheive victory in this Dynasty, then its title in the Dynastic records is changed to bear the name of Katastrophe instead.

There is currently no Katastrophe.

 

Comments

Thelonious:

25-07-2006 08:15:45 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

25-07-2006 08:54:25 UTC

against

ChronosPhaenon:

25-07-2006 11:32:33 UTC

against

Shadowclaw:

25-07-2006 16:21:11 UTC

against

Angry Grasshopper:

25-07-2006 17:38:48 UTC

“If Katastrophe is able to acheive victory in this Dynasty, then its title in the Dynastic records is changed to bear the name of Katastrophe instead.”

You’ll have to forgive me if I say that I hate these sort of rules. ;P

against against

TAE:

25-07-2006 21:53:47 UTC

against
I feel like I remember the last time we had an anti-emperor and it not working terribly well.