Friday, October 21, 2011

Call for Judgment: Emergency Law patch

failed by CfJ “http://blognomic.com/archive/compromise_mark_4_again” -Bucky
unfailed by coppro - the enactment was illegal

CfJ is illegal because it does not “describe the issue” per Rule 1.7. -Ornithopter

Adminned at 22 Oct 2011 14:22:05 UTC

If the rule “Emergency Law” exists and has more opening brackets than closing brackets, add a closing bracket after the first closing quotation mark.

If the rule “Emergency Law” exists, add “as they were at 21 OCT 2011 00:07:07 UTC” after (the nomic described at http://www.agoranomic.org/).

Comments

Ornithopter:

21-10-2011 01:01:19 UTC

for

redtara: they/them

21-10-2011 01:04:49 UTC

Not sure if EAVs are still required on CfJs. for

scshunt:

21-10-2011 01:11:13 UTC

against

Shadowclaw:

21-10-2011 01:14:29 UTC

for

zuff:

21-10-2011 01:15:32 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

21-10-2011 01:16:23 UTC

for

Pavitra:

21-10-2011 01:25:22 UTC

against

Murphy:

21-10-2011 01:28:40 UTC

against

dupdog:

21-10-2011 01:56:09 UTC

against

not general enough.

Tavros:

21-10-2011 02:04:07 UTC

against

pikhq:

21-10-2011 02:32:21 UTC

against

lazerchik:

21-10-2011 02:54:43 UTC

for

Brendan: he/him

21-10-2011 03:01:55 UTC

for

Amnistar: he/him

21-10-2011 03:18:10 UTC

for

Sgeo:

21-10-2011 03:27:38 UTC

against

Yally:

21-10-2011 03:50:41 UTC

against

omd:

21-10-2011 04:30:26 UTC

against

Roujo: he/him

21-10-2011 04:35:59 UTC

against

Tiger:

21-10-2011 09:57:11 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

21-10-2011 10:53:55 UTC

for

Wooble:

21-10-2011 11:24:57 UTC

against

CWW:

21-10-2011 11:34:25 UTC

against

Prince Anduril:

21-10-2011 12:12:59 UTC

against

Rodney:

21-10-2011 13:47:21 UTC

against On principle of patching a CfJ.

ChronosPhaenon:

21-10-2011 13:57:28 UTC

for

lass:

21-10-2011 14:01:47 UTC

for

rebelyellow:

21-10-2011 14:04:40 UTC

for

lazerchik:

21-10-2011 14:25:18 UTC

for disregard previous vote, i was not active yet.

rebelyellow:

21-10-2011 14:35:39 UTC

for

ais523:

21-10-2011 16:34:47 UTC

Why are the newbies voting FOR on this?
for as I don’t see the harm, but it makes me suspicious.

ais523:

21-10-2011 16:36:10 UTC

Ah right.
CoV against; even though this doesn’t block the scam, I don’t really want to have to retroactively change Agora’s rules.

Josh: Observer he/they

22-10-2011 10:33:09 UTC

against