safe guard against Sepulchres created for other reasons

I don’t understand what you mean? I intentionally specified a time in the past in order to prevent anyone exploiting this CFJ to create a Sepulchre illegally.

I believe the three attempts to create Sepulchres were all legal, and your reversion of them was wrong; but I’m CFJing about it rather than getting into an edit war, as the ruleset suggests.

the rules issue never actually existed but this change will prevent shenanigans where somebody makes a room that *is* labeled E4– tho maybe we should just patch in a “you can’t name rooms after grid coords” clause :o

they were only legal because the rules state “Rooms can also be referred to using their grid reference.”

you’re both trying to uphold all attempts to Inhabit a Room, which someone could discover were illegal for other reasons, as well as send the message “The rules as written don’t actually matter”

s/k I missed that Clucky had a failed attempt to create a Sepulchre on 15 June 2021, which this CFJ would also uphold. I thought there were no other failed attempts (and added “this dynasty” as a safeguard), but should have listed them explicitly in order to make sure (rather than relying on my belief that all the attempts were legal).

(note: an s/k on a CFJ doesn’t actually cause it to fail)

! well shucks, CoV to

oh wow yeah good catch that would’ve caused quite the mess I *think* it would technically dust me (as I lose 3 Puissance, and so would’ve gone to zero setting up Room BA and then not even been able to fill out the treasure chest there)

now Brendan can rally people to vote for this as another way to protect his Sepulchre =D