Saturday, January 11, 2025

Proposal: Every Snail For Themselves, Certainly

If the proposal “Every Snail For Themselves” was withdrawn (or otherwise failed with its author’s final vote being AGAINST), make the same changes that it would have made if it were enacted.

JonathanDark seems to have “taken charge of” the problem of solving collaborative scams / action-pooling winning the final race instantly. This has me worried that the reason he’s doing so is to discourage people from exploring their own solutions, whilst planning to withdraw the proposal a little before it passes (especially because he’s voting against my solution in favour of his – why not both?). As such, it seems prudent to guard against that situation using a proposal that does the same thing but with a different author.

Warning This post is still within the four-hour edit window, which will close early if any votes are cast. Consider delaying your vote until after that time.

Comments

JonathanDark: he/him

11-01-2025 01:44:22 UTC

I don’t blame you for a little paranoia, especially when I explicitly called out in my Proposal commentary to reach out for negotiations. I all but said, “Make me an offer I can’t refuse”.

JonathanDark: he/him

11-01-2025 01:44:41 UTC

Within the bounds of not favour-trading beyond this dynasty, of course.

You must be registered and logged in to post comments.