Only three Scribes are not voting AGAINST, which is less than the quorum of five; fails 1-5. -RaichuKFM
Adminned at 06 Aug 2016 15:27:54 UTC
Add the following text to the end of the rule “Resolution of Proposals”:
A pending Vetoed proposal may be failed by any admin at any time.
I’m planning on using vetoes as a mechanic an upcoming dynasty, and setting the veto speed to fast will be necessary for it to function smoothly.
I’m mildly confused, here.
If it’s Dynasty specific, I think it would work better as a Dynastic rule, per Clucky;
And also, work better proposed in said Dynasty?
“But in general, I think having a clear queue is good” - This is an argument in *favor* of fast vetoes.
@Brendan: I can’t think of a single case where it turned out poorly.
I don’t really get why everyone hates the speedy veto so much,
But I’m still not sure why a Dynasty specific clause should be proposed right now?
Barring some shenanigans up your sleeve, the next Dynasty will be either mine, or not come around yet by the time this Proposal resolves?
when i meant “clear queue” I meant “a queue resolved in a clear order” not “a queue that is clear of proposals”
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Clucky: he/him
If you want to use vetos as a mechanic in your dynasty, I’d be in favor of a dynastic rule with this content.
But in general, I think having a clear queue is good. This proposal could create a scenario where someone wants an admin to veto one of their proposals so they can free up a proposal slot.