Monday, May 22, 2017

Proposal: Exploration!

Reaches quorum 8-0. Enacted by pokes.

Adminned at 24 May 2017 21:07:32 UTC

Create a rule “Exploration” with the text:

Each Explorer has a non-negative integer Square Miles Charted, which is tracked in the GNDT.

Casual research suggests 44416 acres (69.4 square miles) per line of latitude at the poles.

Comments

Sphinx:

22-05-2017 21:39:16 UTC

I’m afraid this might turn into a grindy score, which isn’t very welcoming to players who join later.
In addition I think more unique places / things / events / whatever are more interesting.

Oracular rufio:

22-05-2017 21:51:02 UTC

I mean, we can do that, too, and this doesn’t have to determine who wins, I was thinking more of doing something with the aggregate instead.  I just thought it would be neat to keep track.

Madrid:

22-05-2017 22:42:49 UTC

That was the first I thought of too. Although it could be prevented by having a limited quota of a resource/s for actions for the entire dynasty (which is something I loved from Poke’s, it’s superb).

Tentative red cross because of the fear of grind but I don’t see why I shouldn’t green tick this if the context improves.

Sphinx:

22-05-2017 22:52:25 UTC

Good points, I like it. Maybe giving everyone a fairly large amount of starting supplies would be a good idea instead of trickling them out some way or another.

Although I believe the 69.4 miles between latitudes, not area. Since the distance between longitudinal lines decreases the closer they get to the pole, that area doesn’t stay constant either.

Google also tells me that Antarctica has a total area of 3.5 billion acres.

Oracular rufio:

22-05-2017 23:11:20 UTC

Well, it’ll be an approximation.  It’s not like if you, say, go from 77 degrees to 78 degrees you’re going to cover all the squarish area between those two latitude lines and whatever the nearest longitude lines are.  We can say that you go in a straight line and can probably see/investigate one mile east and west, so the area you cover is 69.4 miles long x 1 mile wide = 69.4 square miles.  Simple, and we don’t have to do much potentially miscalculated math.

You might be right, though, maybe we should use a less exacting unit.  Just square miles might be good enough?

card:

23-05-2017 04:51:35 UTC

imperial

Sphinx:

23-05-2017 07:14:36 UTC

for but let’s take 70 square miles per latitude line.

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus: he/they

23-05-2017 10:28:27 UTC

I could write a simple Wolfram Language script to calculate if people would prefer precision.

pokes:

23-05-2017 10:30:47 UTC

for I would prefer non-precision.

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus: he/they

24-05-2017 10:03:06 UTC

for

Madrid:

24-05-2017 15:56:56 UTC

for Quoruming, god save our queue

duck:

24-05-2017 16:01:25 UTC

for I would prefer to record GNDT to track the area charted using the same unit (degrees). And btw, don’t you think the same degrees cannot be charted twice?

orkboi:

24-05-2017 18:49:40 UTC

for